Add to these things the long-standing disaffection towards the
Roman authority. For centuries the Pope had been attempting fresh
encroachments, claiming new powers, demanding more contributions.
All travellers to Rome brought back the same story of corruption and
laxity; men asked themselves why they should submit to the oppression
of an Italian prince. In 1529 the House of Commons drew up a petition
in which, while they did not ask for a change of doctrine, they
complained of the independent legislation claimed by Convocation, the
number of officers, the exorbitant fees of ecclesiastical courts, the
granting of benefices to children, pluralities, non-residence and other
grievances. Surely such a man as Wolsey must have discerned in all
these symptoms a warning, clear and loud, that their house must be set
in order. Perhaps not, however: nothing is more difficult than for the
ecclesiastical mind to see, outside its fences of doctrine and usage,
the questioning people, and to hear and understand the awakened mind.
The action of Henry, which, on the face of it, seems the most masterful
thing ever attempted by a king, was, on the contrary, approved and
accepted by the great mass of the people; especially by the people of
London, by the scholars, and by the clergy. There were few who emulated
the constancy of the unfortunate Carthusians or the martyrdom of More
and Fisher; the old order crumbled and fell to pieces at a touch;
out of the débris, among the fallen monarchs of the forest, rose up
a tangled mass of vegetation, from which the nobler kinds had to be
separated by trial and proof, by persecution and by cultivation.
The first direct step towards the Reformation was, assuredly, not
considered as such. It was the suppression by Cardinal Wolsey of
certain small houses with whose revenues he endowed his Colleges.
The second direct step was the Petition of the House of Commons, which
also passed the Upper House, in 1529.
In January 1531 the House of Commons, in demanding of the clergy the
payment of £118,000—an enormous sum, representing more than a million
of our money—gave Henry the title of Head of the Church. This was
before the break with Rome; so far it meant only that the civil power
should be superior to the ecclesiastical.
Then followed the Bill for the abolition of _annales_ or payment to the
Pope of the first year’s income of benefice or see. This was at first
held _in terrorem_ over the head of the Pope.
The divorce of Katherine and the King’s marriage with Anne Boleyn
in spite of the opposition of the Pope completed the separation.
Henceforth the King was Head of the Church within his own realm.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account