being withdrawn, ran into excesses and fell into the mire; some haunted
taverns, to the disgrace of their former calling. But of suffering or
privation I cannot discover that there was much, if any, either for
monks or nuns. It is pretended that the pensions were irregularly paid.
The evidence seems to me insufficient; in regard to the nuns of St.
Helen’s, we have positive evidence pointing in the opposite direction.
The greatest sufferers were, as we have seen, the friars. For them
there was no pity; for them there were no pensions; no one believed in
them any longer; their day was done. There appeared, a short time ago,
a book written by one who had been for twelve years a friar: he came
out of the House; he laid down his frock and renounced his vows; and
he wrote a book in which he described the life of his late brethren.
It is not an exaggerated or an ill-natured book; it is simply a plain
statement of the manner of life led by the friars of these days.
Looking through its pages one begins unconsciously to consider the
friars of the early sixteenth century—the friars in their last days—by
the light of this revelation. Now the modern friar is a man of some
education and some culture. Take away his education and his culture in
order to get at the friar of the Tudor time. Place him in a time much
rougher and coarser in manners; give him nothing to do: no work either
of mental or physical kind; and to the general futility and unreality
of life in a modern friary add the temptations, almost irresistible to
the uneducated mind of the ordinary friar, of the world around him. In
this way one may succeed, perhaps, in understanding the reasons for the
unpopularity of the friars.
[Illustration: The North Prospect of Westminster Abbey
From an engraving by G. Collins. A. Rischgitz’ Collection.]
It is generally stated that riches flowed in upon the friars as a
consequence of the respect in which they were held. That is not the
case: they were never rich. They owned a few houses built within the
limits of their own precinct, the rent of which went to maintain the
fabric of the church, and the service. For themselves the friars
possessed no great buildings, except the Church, the Library, and the
Hall: and they lived on charity at the end of their time as at the
beginning. Wyclyf makes much of their churches. “Freres bylden mony
grete churches and costily houses, and cloystris as hit were castels
and that withoute nede. Grete houses make not men holy, and onely by
holiness is God wel served.”
The friars were not rich, but they were proud: they arrogated power and
sanctity for their very robe. Those who died in the Franciscan habit
could never, they said, be carried away by the devil. Walsingham, who
had, perhaps, the jealousy of a monk, thus wrote of them:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account