“I saie, that there is none which acknowledgeth God to be onlie
omnipotent ... but will denie that the elements are obedient to
witches, and at their commendement; or that they may at their pleasure
send raine, haile, tempests, thunder, lightning.... Such faithlesse
people are also persuaded that neither hale nor snowe, thunder nor
lightening, raine nor tempestuous winds, come from the heavens at the
commandement of God, but are raised by the cunning and power of witches
and conjurers; inasmuch as a clap of thunder or a gale of wind is no
sooner heard, but wither they run to ring bells, or crie out to burne
witches, or else burne consecrated things, hoping by the smoke thereof
to drive the devill out of the aire.”
Witchcraft and magic were, however, recognised by the Government as
real things. It was thought desirable in 1542 to pass an Act against
these practices.
“It shall be felony to practise, or cause to be practised conjurations,
with craft, enchantment or sorcery, to get money: or to consume any
person in his body, members, or goods; or to provoke any person to
unlawful love; or for the despight of Christ or lucre of money to pull
down any cross; or to declare where goods stolen,” etc.
This Act of Henry VIII. was repeated or confirmed by Elizabeth twenty
years later, and by James I. in 1603. Cranmer, in 1549, ordered the
clergy to inquire “whether you know of any that use charms, sorcery,
enchantment, witchcrafts, soothsaying, or any like craft invented by
the devil.” And in 1558 Bishop Jewel, preaching before the Queen, said,
“It may please your Grace to understand that witches and sorcerers
within these last few years are marvellously increased within your
Grace’s realm. Your subjects pine away even to the death; their colour
fadeth; their flesh rotteth; their speech is benumbed; their senses are
bereft.”
The precautions used against witchcraft do not belong to London, where
the belief in the superstition took a less active form than in the
country. A pebble with a natural hole in it, a horseshoe picked up by
accident and nailed up over the door, a hare’s foot in the pocket, a
bit of witchwood, were simple precautions against the witch. I do not
think that these superstitions were much followed in London, though
there are examples that the terror of the witch prevailed in the City
as well as in the country.
It is remarkable that the spread of education and the toleration of
fine thoughts in religion did not destroy this horrible superstition.
On the contrary it increased, and the seventeenth century, when the
greatest amount of religious freedom was practised if not allowed, only
made the belief in witchcraft more profound.
Who could choose but to believe when Ben Jonson himself could write of
witches as follows?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account