“I am writing to you from an island in the least known of the Swiss
lakes, lying beneath the Jura. The island is the size of a small farm.
It is crossed by a thickly-wooded ridge, and there are reed-grown
marshes on one side, and on the other meadows and gardens and a homely
inn. The inn has grown out of an older cottage or farmhouse, and
certain rooms in the more ancient part of the building have become a
place of local pilgrimage. On Sundays and holidays the workmen of the
small neighbouring towns come here to drink and dance. But the foreign
tourist is more rarely seen here, and the English tourist would most
likely shun the spot if he had heard of it. For these rude quarters
were the refuge, more than a hundred years ago, of a man who, more or
less against his will, lit the great bonfire of the feudal system.
“It was during one of those breaks in his life when, like Jonah of old,
he seemed to be trying to flee from his allotted task, that Rousseau
came and hid himself for this little isle. But the feudal society
craved for destruction, and, like all societies in that condition, it
first bred its destroyer and then steadily goaded him to the work. The
young Marat, from his home a few miles away, must have looked on while
the prophet of the Revolution was being hunted out of this retreat by
the Prussian police, and, as it were, ordered to resume his terrible
apostolate.
“If imagination were possible for public bodies, if gratitude were
conceivable on the part of the Socialist democracy, this isle would not
be turned into a restaurant for bank-holiday workmen. It would be made
a fit memorial of Rousseau by being set apart for the benefit of his
heirs. Every man of genius, driven like him into exile by poverty and
love of freedom, would find here a retreat in which he could rest from
the storms of the world. Or if stupidity were not the curse of gold,
the millionaires themselves would raise a voluntary tax to build an
alms-house for Rousseau and Marat, instead of flogging them on to the
work of anarchy with the sharp goads of hunger and contempt.
“I find that my brother’s unexpected death has made no difference
in my feelings towards England, although I find it has made a great
difference in the feeling of England towards me. My godfather, the
Archbishop, has written to me in the most cordial spirit about my
Church patronage, thanking me in advance for my gracious patronage of
Christianity. He hints that I may play an important part in bringing
the Roman and Anglican communions closer together as the sole means of
preserving society. But I do not want to preserve society. The Prime
Minister’s letter of condolence also contains a hint that in a year or
two, if I behave, I may succeed to the Home Secretaryship--I think he
means all the Cabinet offices to become hereditary in course of time.
But I am not going to behave. England expects every man to be a humbug,
but she will be disappointed as far as I am concerned.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account