Churchill, Randolph Henry Spencer, Lord, 1849-1895
My dear Lord Randolph,--I have been told on good authority that you
had inferred, as the result of our recent communications, that in
our contemplation the National Union was in some manner to take the
place of the Central Committee and to do the work which the latter
exclusively does now.
As my letter does not mention the Central Committee, this
misapprehension (if, indeed, it has arisen) must be due to
something that passed in our conversation at the Carlton on Sunday.
I should blame myself severely if I had misled you as to our views
on this point. The Central Committee are appointed by us and
represent us: and we could not in any degree separate our position
from theirs.
I hope, however, that there is no chance of the paths of the
Central Committee and the National Union crossing: for there is
plenty of good work for both to do.
I am sure you will forgive my giving you the trouble of reading
this letter--which only issues from my desire that we should all
work together in good understanding.
Believe me
Yours very truly,
SALISBURY.
‘With reference to the hope,’ replied Lord Randolph Churchill, ‘which
you express, that “there is no chance of the paths of the Central
Committee and the National Union crossing,” I fear it may be
disappointed. In a struggle between a popular body and a close
corporation, the latter, I am happy to say, in these days goes to the
wall; for the popular body have this great advantage--that, having
nothing to conceal, they can, at any moment they think proper, appeal
fully (and in some measure recklessly) to a favourable and sympathising
public, and I am of opinion that in such a course as this the National
Union will find that I may be of some little assistance to them.’
The report, together with the ‘Charter’ letter, was presented to the
Council at their meeting on the 7th, and their consideration was
adjourned till the 14th. At this adjourned meeting Lord Percy read a
letter which he had received from Lord Salisbury strongly disapproving
of the report and deprecating its adoption. He thereupon moved its
rejection. The Council divided, and Lord Percy’s motion was negatived by
19 votes to 14. The report was then adopted by 19 votes to 7.
The consequences of this decision were surprising. On March 18 Lord
Randolph Churchill received a letter from Mr. Bartley, the principal
agent at the Conservative Central Office, informing him that Lord
Salisbury and Sir Stafford Northcote thought it desirable that the
Central Committee and the National Union should work with separate
establishments, and requesting the National Union to take the necessary
steps for removing their belongings.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account