Then Jehova himself answers from the whirlwind. He does not really answer, he rather asks some pertinent questions. “Have you been present when the foundations of the Earth were laid, when the Stars were born?” If not, how can he, the insignificant pigmy, dare question divine justice. Since you, Job, have no idea of the nature of the divinity (or God, the author fears to mention the word God lest he may offend the delicate susceptibilities of his atheistic friends who fly into a rage when seeing this word as a bull when seeing a red cloth), how can you know the causes or reasons for his attributes? Divine justice is an attribute of the divinity, and if the nature of the divinity is veiled in mystery, divine justice must of necessity remain unknown to mortal creatures, just as human justice is beyond the conception of the amoeba or of the lion. Divine justice can not be compared at all with human justice, just as the sense of justice of the amoeba or of the lion differs from that of man. Now, the same questions may still be asked to-day. We must still recognize the incapacity of the human intellect to penetrate the divine plan of the universe. With all our scientific attainments we still are in ignorance about the sources of light. The length of its waves, its celerity is known to science, but where does the Sun come from? When was he born? Who gave birth to him? Science has traced the synthetic nature of the plant, the analytic nature of the animal, but tell us, Job, whence gets the seed the faculty to begin its synthetic work as soon as it is placed in favorable soil? Here we are silenced like Job of yore and refuse to answer. And we are right. The “whence” and the “why” of things do not lie in the realm of science. Science investigates the “how” and leaves the investigation of the “whence” and the “why” to metaphysics or rather to religion. Even the latter has not yet succeeded to give humanity the irrefutable answer. From the Hindu trinity of Brahm’s Trimurti to the Hebrew unity of Jehovah back to the Christian Logos of John, they all tried to answer the question of the “whence” of things, and they must have failed. Otherwise humanity of all climes and of all ages would have had only one religion instead of being divided into innumerable creeds. As far as the “how” is concerned, such an explanation as “anima muliebris in corpore virili inclusa” is quite a good enough working theory. Inversion would thus be a degenerative phenomenon, the invert representing the sport or the variation.