Love: A Treatise on the Science of Sex-attraction: for the use of Physicians and Students of Medical JurisprudenceTalmey, Bernard Simon
Science
Love: A Treatise on the Science of Sex-attraction: for the use of Physicians and Students of Medical Jurisprudence
Talmey, Bernard Simon
Sex
The history of the evolution of marriage furnishes the reason for
woman’s chastity. The purity of the wife and her faithfulness are of
the greatest racial importance. Chastity has been forced upon her in
a just and laudable cause, not by men[ED] but by economic conditions.
When the moral law once had been established restricting the wife
to a permanent mate, she had to place obstacles, in the form of
general chastity, modesty and coyness, in the way of man’s finding
gratification of his sensual desires elsewhere except with a permanent
mate.
Now, is there a racial reason why men should be as chaste as women?
There are two valid racial reasons why in the interest of posterity men
should be held to as strict a form of chastity as women are. The two
reasons are the “Spirocheta pallida” and the “Gonococcus,” or in other
words, “syphilis” and “gonorrhoea.”
Of the triad of venereal infections, “chancroid” (chancroid may produce
extensive ulcerative processes and mutilate the sexual organs),
“syphilis” and “gonorrhoea” the two latter are of the greatest menace
to the continuation of the human race. Especially gonorrhoea is
undermining the vital forces of humanity, on account of its wide spread
among men.
Neisser, the discoverer of the gonococcus, claims that of the adult
male population inhabiting large cities only an insignificant
proportion escapes gonorrhoeal infection.[EE]
The reason of the spread of gonorrhoea is the mistaken idea that
gonorrhoea is a local trouble. Even among the educated people who have
had the best opportunities of education and refinement, there are
very few who know that gonorrhoea, once acquired, may remain latent
for years and still be the means of infecting an innocent wife and
destroying the eyesight of her child. The so-called cure of gonorrhoea
is not seldom only the establishment of toleration of the presence
of the gonococcus on the part of the individual’s urethra. But the
imperceptible discharge still remains virulently contagious to the
healthy virginal genito-urinary passage of the young wife and to the
delicate tender conjunctiva of the new-born baby.
The non-multiplying gonococci, which have apparently been deprived
of their power to cause suppuration any longer at the point of the
first infection, may possess full virulence and also the capacity of
producing suppuration if transferred to some other mucous membrane,
especially in the virginal vulva, urethra, Bartholinian glands, cervix,
tubes, ovaries and peritoneum of the newly-married wife.[EF]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account