Love and liberty : $b A thrilling narrative of the French Revolution of 1792Dumas, Alexandre
History
Love and liberty : $b A thrilling narrative of the French Revolution of 1792
Dumas, Alexandre
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799 -- Fiction
I turned round to see whether Robespierre and Danton would not make
some objection to our employment; but both had gone, and, in fact,
the hall was all but empty, so that the petition was dictated to
space.
The two editors remarked that the members had retired because they
felt their presence to be useless, and knew that the petition would
be read to them on the following morning; but soon an emissary
arrived, who spoke in an undertone to M. de Laclos. During this
time I again read the petition, and then I understood the ponderous
significance of the five words which had been so aptly added by the
well-known author of “Liaisons Dangereuses.”
_The constitutional means_ by which they could replace the King, was
by placing on the throne the Dauphin, governed by a regency; but the
brothers of the King, the Comte d’Artois and the Comte de Provence,
being out of France, the Regent’s office belonged, of right, to the
Duc d’Orleans, who would thus take the same place by the throne of
Louis XVI as his ancestor had by the throne of his predecessor, Louis
XV. I asked myself why it was that Brissot never thought of that,
though I did. But I said to myself that perhaps he would not be angry
at being hidden behind the word _constitutional_ as he knew that the
petition was his own work.
At this moment, the fears of M. de Laclos appeared to be realized.
The emissary who had whispered in his ear, had come to tell him
that the constitutional Royalists of the Jacobins, and those of
the National Assembly, were going to rejoin the Feuillants, and
thus separate themselves from the pure Jacobin—that is to say, the
Republican.
The two heads of the emigration movement were Duport and Lameth.
Their intention was to form a new club, composed of friends of the
Constitution—an aristocratic assembly where none were admitted but
by a pass-card, and where they received none but electors, who then
stayed with the veritable Jacobins—none, with the exception of six or
seven demagogue deputies and the _canaille_ who followed in the steps
of the Duc d’Orleans, and who formed the entire club.
“What is to be done?” asked Brissot. “They wish to have the Assembly
to themselves.”
“Good!” said Laclos: “but what does it matter as long as we have the
people on our side? Let us proceed.”
Brissot continued his dictation, in which, however, Laclos no longer
took part.
On the morrow, Saturday, M. Duplay and myself did not fail to be at
the Jacobin club, where were assembled scarcely thirty persons.
They waited an hour; and at twelve there were assembled, perhaps,
forty. The petition was read and applauded. All paid attention to the
phrase introduced by M. Laclos, and it was decided that the petition
should be taken in its present form to the Champ de Mars, there to be
signed on the altar of the country.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account