Love and liberty : $b A thrilling narrative of the French Revolution of 1792Dumas, Alexandre
History
Love and liberty : $b A thrilling narrative of the French Revolution of 1792
Dumas, Alexandre
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799 -- Fiction
Thus it was that this unhappy woman, who had begun life so
extravagantly, while the masses were starving, irritated the people,
and especially all those who had dealings with her, by the apparent
childishness and weakness of her general character. It was felt
that no reliance could be placed upon her. Born of the great feudal
Austrian family about whom etiquette was so plastered, that only
nobles could sit down in the presence of the royal family, and then
upon a very low stool, she was brought to France at a very early
age, to a Court almost as ridiculous as the one she had left. But
while the Austrians had been excited to no feelings of hate against
their Emperor, Voltaire, Rousseau, Diderot, had taught the French
to look upon royalty as made up of merciless, greedy puppets; and,
unfortunately, Marie Antoinette—a pure and noble-hearted woman in
herself—had the appearance of totally agreeing with this description.
While the people were starving, her passion for jewels became
absorbing; while mothers were begging meals for their little ones,
she was taking parts in little comedies at Versailles.
Her memory can scarcely be blamed. She had never seen the people;
and, as a proof that she knew nothing about them and their wants, we
hear about her the celebrated anecdote, which helped to send her to
the scaffold. Being told the people wanted bread, she replied, “If
there is no bread, why do they not eat cake?”
The people never forgave that—she washed those words only partly
out with her blood. Did she really mean what she said, or were the
words intended for a joke? Did she really think that if there was no
bread there must be cake; or did she utter that fatal sentence as
a witticism? I venture to think that she was ignorant of the very
meaning of starvation; for courtiers treat kings and queens like
children. A misfortune this, when the people expect them to be men
and women—the condition of things when the Revolution broke out.
Louis XVI was incapable of managing anything but a lock; his wife
thought she could govern for him, and she made a sorry mistake.
The King’s grandfather, Louis XV, the preceding King, had said,
“After me, the deluge.” The deluge was upon the royal family,
sweeping around them, and was to overwhelm the family.
The popular feeling was far stronger against the Queen than the King.
“See,” she said, one day, before Dumouriez and the King, and pointing
through a window near her; “a prisoner in this palace, I dare not
venture to present myself at a window that overlooks the garden. But
yesterday I wished to breathe the air, and went to the window. An
artilleryman used the language of a guard-room, and hurled his words
at me; held up his sword, and said he should like to see my head on
it. I have seen them murdering a priest, and meanwhile, not ten yards
away, children and their nurses are playing at ball. What a country,
and what people!”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account