Love and liberty : $b A thrilling narrative of the French Revolution of 1792Dumas, Alexandre
History
Love and liberty : $b A thrilling narrative of the French Revolution of 1792
Dumas, Alexandre
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799 -- Fiction
On the morning of that terrible 10th of August, Madame Elizabeth, the
King’s sister, who had been watching through the night, listening to
the ringing of that bell which all the Royalists knew was the tocsin
of murder,—this pure-hearted Elizabeth called to the Queen.
“Sister,” she said, “come and see the sun rise.”
And Marie Antoinette looked for the last time upon a sunrise (it was
typically blood-red) which she was to see through the palace windows.
To Rœderer, the deputy, was due the first suggestion of that act
which was really the King’s abdication—that of abandoning the royal
palace, and asking hospitality of the Parliament.
“Place yourselves, madame,” he said, “in the care of the National
Assembly. Your persons will then be as sacred as the constitution.”
The constitution itself was to be a thing of the past in a few weeks.
At five in the morning, the Queen had her children dressed and
brought to her. The King himself, by his appearance, should have
steeped the guard in confidence. He should have appeared in uniform.
On the contrary, he appeared in a suit of violet silk—court mourning,
in fact, without boots or spurs, in white silk stockings and pumps;
while his hair presented an absurd spectacle, for it had not been
dressed since the previous day; and while one side was still rounded
and curled, the other was flat and ragged. He looked about smilingly,
but with that vagueness in which no reliance can be placed. He was
simply a good, stupid, amiable man. He kept apart, all his reign,
making locks; he forgot his people, and he was weak enough to
suppose his people would forget him.
As for the Queen she was never more royal.
“Take these!” she said, seizing a couple of pistols and forcing them
into his hands; “and conquer or die with your friends.”
The King however, handed them to a gentleman by his side, saying,
“No; if I wore arms, the people might be angry.”
A royal progress was made in the court-yard of the Tuileries, even in
the palace-garden beyond. At first received with faint applause, the
cries of hate soon overwhelmed the King, and it was with difficulty
he gained the palace alone.
The tocsin had now been calling to arms through many hours.
Meanwhile, Danton, the man of blood, was maddening the people.
“To arms!” he cried. “Do you not hear the call?”
The infuriated people were now upon the palace.
They attempted once more to burst the doors, while the artillerymen
refused to fire upon the insurgents.
And now the fatal, but inevitable, mistake was made.
“Sire,” cried Rœderer to the King, “time presses. It is no longer
entreaty we use, and only one means is left us. We ask your
permission to use violence towards you; and, by force, to place you
under the safety of the National Assembly.”
The King still did not wish to leave the palace. He turned to the
Queen.
“Let us go.”
Never again did the royal couple step beneath the roof of that
palace. They left it for a barred prison—that barred prison for the
scaffold.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account