Love and liberty : $b A thrilling narrative of the French Revolution of 1792Dumas, Alexandre
History
Love and liberty : $b A thrilling narrative of the French Revolution of 1792
Dumas, Alexandre
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799 -- Fiction
It being ordered that more bolts should be placed upon the doors of
the tower in which the King was imprisoned, the mason employed to
sink the holes in the stone-work into which the bolts were to run,
going to a meal, and leaving his work tools upon the ground, the King
took up a chisel, and began laboring at the means taken to strengthen
his prison. The mason recognised the King at this labor.
“Ah,” said he “when you leave this place, you will be able to say you
worked at your own prison.”
“And how shall I leave it?” asked the King, who suddenly drew his son
towards him, and retired to his cell, where he paced up and down a
long while.
The watch was intense. Every loaf of bread sent to the royal table
was searched and broken, the fruit—the very kernel of a peach, upon
one occasion split to find a letter.
A deputation arriving, asked the King whether he lacked anything.
“Yes,” he said; “my wife and family want clothes—you see we are in
rags.”
Meanwhile, the King’s cousin, the Duke of Orleans, who had become a
Republican under the name of Citizen Philip Equality, uttered no word
in favor of his royal cousin languishing in the Temple.
Another misfortune now fell upon the King. It will be remembered
how fond the King was of lock-making. His master in the art, one
Gamain, had loved the King dearly, but he turned upon the fallen
monarch. It appears that prior to quitting the Tuileries, the King,
being desirous of hiding certain treasures, and especially certain
papers received from abroad, relative to the schemes in progress for
helping the King by the invasion of France, he had worked with this
blacksmith at the formation of a hiding-place in the walls of the
palace for the iron box, which contained these papers and valuables.
After the arrest of the King, Gamain fell ill of a slow consuming
illness, probably low fever, when gradually he convinced himself
that a certain glass of water the King had himself handed the
locksmith, while they were both putting the finishing strokes to
the hiding-place, was poisoned, and that the King’s motive was a
conviction that the secret of these State papers could only be safe
through his, the blacksmith’s, death. This man must surely have been
overpowered by delirium when such a conviction took possession of
him. His illness continuing, the thought of revenge took possession
of him; and finally, he denounced the whole affair to the Convention.
This act did more to send the King to the scaffold than any other
process executed against Louis XVI. In the first place, the theory
of the poison was at once accepted, and it appeared necessarily
very feasible to a multitude ignorant of the question of poisons;
and, in the second, no proof could be brought against Louis of
conspiring with a foreign Power to invade France; an act which was
treason—therefore one which, proved, called for the penalty of death.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account