Love and liberty : $b A thrilling narrative of the French Revolution of 1792Dumas, Alexandre
History
Love and liberty : $b A thrilling narrative of the French Revolution of 1792
Dumas, Alexandre
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799 -- Fiction
Indeed, he asked for it. The act is well worth admiration. At
seventy-four, when most men are weary of life, this good man asked
for a position which he knew was one which might involve the
forfeiture of his own existence. Said he, “I was twice summoned to
the council of him who was my master at a time when everybody was
ambitious of the post, and I owe him this service now that this
office is, in the eyes of most persons, one of danger; and had I the
means of acquainting him with my wishes, I should not seek another
mode of striving to serve him” (he was speaking to the President of
the Convention); “but I think, seeing the position you hold, that you
can most safely convey to Louis XVI my desire to serve him.”
The Convention, violent as were its members, reverenced this devotion
of friendship, and honest Malsherbes was appointed to the task of
defending the fallen King.
“Malsherbes,” said a friend to him, as he was leaving the Convention,
“you are the friend of Louis XVI; how can you bring him papers in
which he will read the expressions of the wrath of the people against
him?”
“The King is not like other men,” returned M. de Malsherbes. “He
possesses a great mind, and such faith as raises him above all
things.”
“You are an honest man,” replied the friend. “But if you were not,
what is to prevent you from bringing him poison, as a weapon, or
advising him to commit suicide?”
Malsherbes hesitated for a moment, and then he replied, “If the
King were of the religion of the philosophers—were he a Cato or a
Brutus—he might kill himself. But he is pious—he is a Christian—he
knows that religion forbids him to lay violent hands upon himself,
and he will not commit suicide.”
Malsherbes went daily after this to see the King, to commune with him
upon the defence which was to be set up.
But of what avail was any defence? The question was not whether or
not the King was guilty, but whether or not his death would be of
advantage to the establishment of the republic.
During these final days of his life, the King was entirely deprived
of the consolation of seeing his family. He was now kept completely
isolated. However, by the mercy of Cléry, his servant, on the one
hand, and that of Turgy, the Queen’s attendant, on the other, the
desolate couple communicated. A few words were written on a morsel of
thin paper, which, being folded, a needle was run through it, and it
was in this condition concealed in a hank of sewing-thread, which was
put in the Queen’s work-box by Turgy, who placed the thread, and its
answering line, in Cléry’s way, who conveyed it to a place where the
King would look for it.
Louis XVI never had any doubt that he would be executed. On the
other hand, he does not appear, up to the time of his trial, to have
assumed for one moment that the Queen would suffer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account