Love and liberty : $b A thrilling narrative of the French Revolution of 1792Dumas, Alexandre
History
Love and liberty : $b A thrilling narrative of the French Revolution of 1792
Dumas, Alexandre
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799 -- Fiction
She answered all questions quite patiently, showed sorrow only when
reference was made to the Princess de Lamballe, and only lost her
quietude when one Hébert was called. It is to be hoped this man was
mad. At all events, he spoke to the Queen’s acts while in the Temple;
declared that she was depraved and debauched, and that she had even
corrupted her own son, “that she might poison his body and his soul,
and so reign in his name over the ruin of his understanding.”
This man was mad—there can be no doubt upon the point: he even
included saintly Madame Elizabeth in this frantic idiotic accusation.
Heaven be thanked, those present turned upon him, and cried “Shame!”
The Queen herself shrank, raising her hand as though to guard her
from the wretch.
But one juryman was nearly as bad as Hébert.
“Why does not the accused answer?” this foul wretch asked.
“I do not answer,” she said—and once again, it is said, she looked
radiantly beautiful in her momentary indignation—“because these are
accusations to which nature refuses a reply.”
She turned to the women, with whom the court was crowded.
“I appeal from him to all mothers present.”
To the honor of these women be it said, they cried Hébert down—and so
he passes out of this history.
The Queen met questions having reference to the King with equal
calmness. It being alleged that she endeavored to obtain ascendancy
over him through his mental weakness, she replied, “I never knew
that character of him. I was but his wife, and it was my duty and my
pleasure to yield to his will.”
By not one word, tending to save herself, did she injure the memory
of her husband.
One line in the trial is enough to show what a mockery it was.
The Public Prosecutor cried, “All France bears witness against this
woman!”
For form’s sake, the jury deliberated an hour. She was recalled to
hear her sentence, but the cheering and screaming of the people told
her its terrors before the judge spoke—_death!_
Nine months since the King died, and now there was an end to her
weary waiting.
Asked if she had anything to say why the sentence of death should not
be carried out, she respected herself in her very silence, and turned
away, as though quite prepared for execution.
It was now five in the morning, and her last day was come. At
half-past five she was permitted to write a letter to the King’s
sister, Madame Elizabeth. This lady never saw it. The document was
found long afterwards amongst the papers of one Couthon.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account