Love to the Uttermost: Expositions of John XIII.-XXI.Meyer, F. B. (Frederick Brotherton)
Religion
Love to the Uttermost: Expositions of John XIII.-XXI.
Meyer, F. B. (Frederick Brotherton)
Bible. John -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
Ch. v. 18.--He was only at the beginning of the second year of His
ministry, and had just healed the impotent man at the pool of Bethesda,
and we find the Jews consulting how they might kill Him, and He was
compelled again to retire from Judaea.
Ch. vii. 19.--Such was the spirit of vindictiveness excited against our
Lord that when twelve months afterward He came to Jerusalem at the
Feast of Tabernacles, one of His first words was, "Why go ye about to
kill Me?" The people were well acquainted with the designs of the
rulers (vers. 25, 26); and ultimately officers were sent to arrest Him
(vers. 30, 32).
Ch. viii. 59.--They were so exasperated with His words that they took
up stones to stone Him.
Ch. ix. 34.--They excommunicated the blind man because their hated foe
had cured him, and he in his favor had dared to protest.
Ch. x. 31.--The Jews (and the Apostle always uses that word of the
Sanhedrim and their allies) took up stones to cast at Him; and in verse
39 we read that they sought again to take Him; but He escaped out of
their land to Perea, where He remained until the message of the sisters
called Him from His retreat.
Ch. xi. 47.--The raising of Lazarus produced such an effect that a
special council was called to consider what should be done, with the
result that from that day they took counsel to put Him to death.
Ch. xii. 10.--Their malignity was so great that they consulted whether
they should not put Lazarus to death also; because by reason of him
many of the Jews went away and believed in Jesus.
It was all this that made them fall in so eagerly with the proposal of
Judas that he should betray Him unto them.
Now at last they had Him in their power, and their object was to
convict Him of some crime which would justify the infliction of the
severest sentence of the law. To preserve the appearance of justice,
witnesses were called to testify to some action or speech which would
involve blasphemy against their law, and, if possible, against the
Roman law as well; and it was necessary that two of them should agree
in some specific charge. The chief priests, and elders, and all the
council, Matthew tells us, sought for witness against Jesus to put Him
to death. They brought forward many, but either their charges did not
reach the required degree of criminality, or the clumsy witnesses,
brought hastily forward, undrilled beforehand, broke down so grossly in
their story that for shame's sake they had to be dismissed.
At last two witnesses appeared who seemed likely to agree on a very
momentous charge. They said they had heard Him utter, more than two
years ago, words which seemed to threaten the very existence of the
temple. But, when more closely questioned, their witness also broke
down utterly. It seemed as though Jesus was not to die, except on His
own testimony to His own supreme claims. All lesser counts failed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account