Lucifer: A Theosophical Magazine. Volume I. September 1887-February 1888.Various
Religion
Lucifer: A Theosophical Magazine. Volume I. September 1887-February 1888.
Various
Theosophy -- Periodicals
At this point, therefore, it will be necessary to enter, at some
length, on this question, because it has been supposed that the idea
of Karma is identical, or nearly so, with that of predestination.
Consequently, it will be necessary to attempt a definition of what
Free-will and Will are. Will, to the ordinary man, is known
according to his experience as the power to do or not to do an
action. So far, he is perfectly right, but, as usual, man limits the
action of his will to the physical plane, and takes no account of
even the mental plane. Even if he does not commit an action, he
cannot help thinking about it, because he has desired to do it—even
if he has repressed that desire. Nothing is more common than to hear
anyone say, “I can’t help my likes and dislikes,” or, in other
words, their attractions and repulsions, desires and the reverse.
Consequently, until a man can control his desires, those desires
control his will, and, consequently, predestination appears to rule
the day. Thus we find that it is desire which impels man onward on
his course, and governs that course to a very large extent, and this
is the principle which is at its highest development in mankind as a
rule. Now if it be granted that the human personality—a transient
thing—has been constituted by man’s vanity as the centre of the
Universe, it is plain that the combination of this principle of
desire with the pronounced personality, will only serve to intensify
this personality and bind man fast to it. Man thus constituted is a
prisoner, and, more often than not, is so attached to his prison
that he prefers to flutter his wings against the bars of his cage,
instead of endeavouring to escape. But are there any means of
escape:—it may be asked? Desire binds man fast to his personality,
and intensifies one personality against another. Hence it is
productive of strife and discord, and militates strongly against the
law of universal harmony, or Karma, in this aspect. Thus desire and
Karma would seem to be in complete opposition, and desire cannot be
said to be a consequence of Karma. But really this is a confusion of
terms, for all this only exists in the world of effects and not in
that of causes. Desire is an effect of the accentuated personality,
and in its turn produces that personality. This constitutes the
prison, and the only means of escape from this prison of discord is
the endeavour to produce harmony in its place. Thus, therefore, we
have a definition of will as being not only that which represses a
desire, but also an emanation of the one divine principle, and
proceeding from the divine in man. In one sense, this will, this
harmonizer of the discord, is identical with Karma. As a
consequence, we can see that Karma produces punishment. That
punishment arises from the fact that the assertion of both desire
and will in any man makes him the battle-field of two opposing
forces—the desire to do anything, and thus gratify the desire, and
the will to repress it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account