Lucifer: A Theosophical Magazine. Volume I. September 1887-February 1888.Various
Religion
Lucifer: A Theosophical Magazine. Volume I. September 1887-February 1888.
Various
Theosophy -- Periodicals
“I mean by philosopher, the man who is devoted to the acquisition of
knowledge, real knowledge, and not merely inquisitive. The more our
citizens approach this temperament, the better the state will be.
True knowledge in its perfection and its entirety, man cannot
attain. But he can attain to a kind of knowledge of realities, if he
has any knowledge at all, because he cannot know nonentities. Hence
his knowledge is half-way between real knowledge and ignorance, and
we must call it opinion.”
NOTE.—Several questions which have been received are held over to
be answered next month.
------------------
_To the Editors of_ LUCIFER.
In the interesting and lucid article on “Karma” in your number of
September 15th, everything seems to hinge on the theory of
re-incarnation. “Very well,” says the author of that paper, “let
us take the principle of re-incarnation for granted.” But is not
this a rather unphilosophical way of handling a subject of such
gravity? Take this or that principle for granted, and you may go
about to prove anything under the sun. It is the old weakness of
begging the question. Is it not this taking for granted what
cannot be proved, and is not attempted to be proved, that has led
astray speculators—both scientific and religious—everywhere and in
every age, and is it not upon similar assumptions that the whole
monstrous fabric of theology rests? Of course, in every kind of
speculation one is compelled to set out with an assumption of some
sort; but then the first thing the reader demands is, that the
grounds shall be shown upon which the assumption rests; the
assumption, whatever it be, must be made good before one can be
asked to accept that which is to be raised upon it. And here comes
in my question: What is the warrant or sanction for the principle
of re-incarnation? What is the principle grounded upon? Do we
undergo re-incarnation, and how do you know it?
Having set out with the assumption, the author does not return to it
again, and at the end of the article I am as uninstructed as at the
outset respecting the pivotal principle upon which all that follows
seems to turn.
INTERROGATOR.
------------------
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account