Lucifer: A Theosophical Magazine. Volume I. September 1887-February 1888.Various
Religion
Lucifer: A Theosophical Magazine. Volume I. September 1887-February 1888.
Various
Theosophy -- Periodicals
“Count Tolstoi then related with great fulness of detail the
history of his change of attitude toward the teaching of Christ,
and the steps by which he was brought to see that that teaching,
rightly understood, furnishes a reasonable solution of some of the
darkest problems of human life. He based upon it not only his
opposition to resistance as a means of overcoming evil, but his
hostility to courts of justice, established churches, class
distinctions, private property, and all civil and ecclesiastical
organisation in existing forms. His frequent references to the New
Testament, and his insistence on the precepts of Christ as
furnishing the only rule for the right government of human
conduct, might lead one to regard Count Tolstoi as a devout and
orthodox Christian, but, judged by a doctrinal standard, he is
very far from being so. He rejects the whole doctrinal framework
of the Christian scheme of redemption, including original sin,
atonement, the triune personality of God, and the divinity of
Christ, and has very little faith in the immortality of the soul.
His religion is a religion of this world, and it is based almost
wholly upon terrestrial considerations. If he refers frequently to
the teachings of Christ, and accepts Christ’s precepts as the
rules which should govern human conduct, it is not because he
believes that Christ was God, but because he regards those
precepts as a formal embodiment of the highest and noblest
philosophy of life, and as a revelation, in a certain sense, of
the Divine will and character. He insists, however, that Christ’s
precepts shall be understood—and that they were intended to be
understood—literally and in their most obvious sense. He will not
recognise nor tolerate any softening or modification of a hard
commandment by subtle and plausible interpretation. If Christ
said, ‘Resist not evil,’ he meant resist not evil. He did not mean
resist not evil if you can help it, nor resist not evil unless it
is unbearable; he meant resist not at all. How unflinchingly Count
Tolstoi faces the logical results of his system of belief I have
tried to show.”
Count Tolstoi’s views as to his own action and practice have been
recently published in an authorised interview which appeared in a
Russian journal. He said:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account