Lucifer: A Theosophical Magazine. Volume I. September 1887-February 1888.Various
Religion
Lucifer: A Theosophical Magazine. Volume I. September 1887-February 1888.
Various
Theosophy -- Periodicals
This volume, we see, is highly appreciated by the clergy, by whom,
at this gloomy day of infidelity, even small favours seem to be
thankfully received. The author (profane name unknown) hints, when
he does not state plainly, that he is a reincarnation of Gautama
Buddha, or Siddartha, as also of a few other no meaner historical
personages. The work is a clever steering between the sandbanks of
science and theology. Enough is given in careful agreement with the
former to make it ignore the more abundant concessions to the gods
of the latter—_e.g._, Biblical chronology. The age of the world is
allowed 6240 years from Adam, “seven hundred years after the brown
and black races had been created” (p. 53 “Chronology”); the date of
the earth’s incrustation and globe being left to the imagination of
the reader. A chronological table of the principal historical events
of the world is published on pages 53-56. Among them the birth of
Moses is placed 1572 B.C. The Vedas are shown compiled in India, and
the poems of Homer in Greece, “about 1200 B.C.” Siddartha or Gautama
established Buddhism in India “from 808 to 726,” B.C. we are told.
Last, but not least, of the world epochs and _divine_ signs of the
time, comes the for ever memorable event of March 31st, 1885—namely,
the “Book of Life, Vonisa, was completely written,” and it closes
the list. The reader is notified, moreover, at the line beginning
with A.D. 6240, that the year 1884 C.E. (Christian Era) is the
“beginning of Messianic age and close of Christian age,” which might
account for the appearance and publication in the year following of
the original volume now under review.
The new Messiah declares that “although much of the work consists of
discoveries which are original with the author, yet the reader will
find in the Analytic Index a few hundred out of the many references
which might be given to eminent authorities which were consulted in
its preparation.” Among these, it seems, one has to include some
theosophic writings, as it is stated in the “Book of Life” that—
(_a._) “Seven great forces were concerned in these vast movements
of early creation.”
(_b._) “Seven Ages of the Earth.”
(_c._) “Vayomer Elohim” translated “according to the laws of the
Hebrew language,” means that “seven forces were used as three-fold
factors,” and
(_d._) “That the first human beings were incarnated spirits” (pp.
26-27).
The above four declarations have the approval of theosophy. Whether
the sentence that follows, namely, that “the work of incarnation (of
the _spirits_) took place according to law,” and is “the clearest
hypothesis _which science has to offer concerning the origin of
man_,” will meet with the same approval from Messrs. Huxley,
Haeckel, and Fiske, of the “Atomo-mechanical Theory,” is very
doubtful.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account