Lucifer: A Theosophical Magazine. Volume I. September 1887-February 1888.Various
Religion
Lucifer: A Theosophical Magazine. Volume I. September 1887-February 1888.
Various
Theosophy -- Periodicals
No evil wisher of the said Society, rushing into publicity with
denunciations, and occasionally libellous attacks upon that body,
ought—if he is a fair-minded and _honest_ opponent, of course—to
publish anything without first making himself well acquainted with
the contents of _The Theosophist_, and especially with the
_Supplements_ attached to that journal.
This advice is given in all kindness to our traducers—the learned as
the ignorant—for their direct benefit, though at an evident
disadvantage to theosophy. For, as so many of our critics have been
lately making fools of themselves, in their alleged _exposés_ of our
doctrines, it is to the advantage of our Society to let them go on
undisturbed, and thus turn the laugh on the enemy. Two graphic
instances may be cited. In “Buddhism in Christendom; or, Jesus the
Essene,” by an impolite dabbler in Orientalism, the septenary
doctrine of the Occultists is disfigured out of recognition, and is
met by the unanimous hearty laugh of those who know something of the
subject. Its unlucky author has evidently never opened a serious
theosophical work, unless, indeed, the doctrine is too much above
his head. As a refreshing contrast one finds, in “Earth and Its
Earliest Ages,” by G. H. Pember, an author, who has most
conscientiously studied and understood the fundamental doctrines of
Theosophy.
Thus, notwithstanding his attempt to connect it with the coming
Antichrist, and show its numerous writers pledged to the work of
Satan, “the Prince of the Powers of the Air,”[18] the volume
published by that learned and fair-minded gentleman is a true pearl
in the _anti_-Theosophical literature. The correct enunciation of
knowledge of the tenets he disapproves, as a sincere orthodox
Christian, is remarkable; and his language, dignified, polite, and
entirely free from any personality can but call forth as courteous a
reply from those he arraigns. He has evidently read, and, what is
more, _understood_, what he found in the _Theosophist_, and other
mystic volumes. It shall, therefore, be the pleasure and duty of
LUCIFER, who bears no malice for the personal attack, to review this
interesting volume in its October issue, hoping to see as kind a
notice of “Earth and Its Earliest Ages” in the _Theosophist_ of
Madras.
-----
Footnote 18:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account