Luck, or Cunning, as the Main Means of Organic ModificationButler, Samuel
Philosophy
Luck, or Cunning, as the Main Means of Organic Modification
Butler, Samuel
Evolution; Natural selection
“But showing themselves,” continues Professor Ray Lankester, “at each new
act of reproduction, as part of the phenomena of heredity such minute
‘sports’ or ‘variations’ are due to constitutional disturbance” (No
doubt. The difference, however, between Mr. Darwin and Lamarck consists
in the fact that Lamarck believes he knows what it is that so disturbs
the constitution as generally to induce variation, whereas Mr. Darwin
says he does not know), “and appear not in individuals subjected to new
conditions” (What organism can pass through life without being subjected
to more or less new conditions? What life is ever the exact fac-simile
of another? And in a matter of such extreme delicacy as the adjustment
of psychical and physical relations, who can say how small a disturbance
of established equilibrium may not involve how great a rearrangement?),
“but in the offspring of all, though more freely in the offspring of
those subjected to special causes of constitutional disturbance. Mr.
Darwin has further proved that these slight variations can be transmitted
and intensified by selective breeding.”
Mr. Darwin did, indeed, follow Buffon and Lamarck in at once turning to
animals and plants under domestication in order to bring the plasticity
of organic forms more easily home to his readers, but the fact that
variations can be transmitted and intensified by selective breeding had
been so well established and was so widely known long before Mr. Darwin
was born, that he can no more be said to have proved it than Newton can
be said to have proved the revolution of the earth on its own axis.
Every breeder throughout the world had known it for centuries. I believe
even Virgil knew it.
“They have,” continues Professor Ray Lankester, “in reference to
breeding, a remarkably tenacious, persistent character, as might be
expected from their origin in connection with the reproductive process.”
The variations do not normally “originate in connection with the
reproductive process,” though it is during this process that they receive
organic expression. They originate mainly, so far as anything originates
anywhere, in the life of the parent or parents. Without going so far as
to say that no variation can arise in connection with the reproductive
system—for, doubtless, striking and successful sports do occasionally so
arise—it is more probable that the majority originate earlier. Professor
Ray Lankester proceeds:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account