We certainly cannot accept as historic the picture of religious
practice, or malpractice, given in the following: whenever his eyes
fell upon a figure of Christ, owing to his popish upbringing, he
“would have preferred to see the devil rather than Christ”; he had
thought “that he had been raised to the company of angels,” but found
he had really been “among devils”; he had “raged” in his search for
comfort in Holy Scripture; he had also continuously suffered “a
very great martyrdom and the task-mastership” of his conscience.
“Self-righteousness” only had counted for anything; so great was it
that he had been taught not to thank God for the Sacrament, but that
God should thank him; but, notwithstanding all these errors, he had
always sought after a “merciful God” and had at last found Him by
coming to understand His gospel.
The birth and growth of this fable in the mind of Luther as he
advanced in years will occupy us later. The present writer may point
out, that no convincing answer has been given to the objections
against the legend which he made public even prior to the appearance
of Denifle’s first volume,[261] and which were repeated therein
independently, and at considerably greater length. On the Protestant
side, too, much more caution is now being observed in the use of
Luther’s later descriptions of his own development, the tendency being
to use contemporary sources instead. This is seen, for instance,
in the studies by Braun on Luther’s theory of concupiscence and by
Hunzinger on Luther’s mysticism, which will be quoted later.
In explanation of the inner process through which Luther went, the
primary reason for his turning away from Catholic doctrine has been
attributed by some Catholics to scrupulosity combined with an unhealthy
self-righteousness, which by an inward reaction grew into carelessness
and despair. How far this view is correct, and how far it requires to
be supplemented by other important factors, will be shown further on.
Meanwhile another altogether too summary theory, a theory which
overshoots the mark, must first be considered.
2. Whether Evil Concupiscence is Irresistible?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account