He attempts, however, to mingle softer tones with the voices of
despair, which, he admits, these theories have let loose. This he can
only do at the expense of his own teaching, or by fining it down. He
says: whoever is terrified and confused, but then tries to abandon
himself with indifference to the severity of God, he, let this be
his comfort, is not of the number of those predestined to hell. For
only those who are really to be rejected are not afraid[?], “they
pay no heed to the danger and say, if I am to be damned, so be it!”
On the other hand, confusion and fear are signs of the “_spiritus
contribulatus_,” which, according to his promise, God never rejects
(Ps. 1.).
After all, then, we are forced to ask, according to this, is not man
to be saved by his own act, namely, the act of heroic indifference to
his eternity? For this act remains an act of man: “Whoever is filled
with the fear of God, and, taking courage, throws and precipitates
himself into the truth of the promises of God, he will be saved, and
be one of the elect.”[494]
3. The Fight against “Holiness-by-Works” and the Observantines in the
Commentary on Romans
His ideas on predestination were not the direct cause of Luther’s
belittling of human effort and the value of good works; the latter
tendency was present in him previous to his adoption of rigid
predestinarianism; nor does he ever attribute to election by grace
any diminution of man’s powers or duties, whether in the case of the
chosen or of the reprobate. The same commandments are given to those
whom God’s terrible decree has destined for hell as to the elect; they
possess the same human abilities, the same weaknesses. It was not
predestination which led him in the first instance to attribute such
strength to concupiscence in man, and to invest it, as he ultimately
did, with an actually sinful and culpable character.
His ideas concerning the absolute corruption of the children of Adam,
even to the extinction of any liberty in the doing of what is good, had
another origin, and, in their development, were influenced far more by
false mysticism than by the predestinarian delusion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account