In his not very choice pleasantries when referring to the intercourse
with women which resulted from his writings, Luther makes use of a
very equivocal expression, for “_misceor feminis_,” taken literally
in the context in which it stands, would imply sexual commerce with
women, which is not at all what the writer intends to convey. It
cannot be denied that the jest about the three women and the ambiguous
word “_misceor_,” are out of place and not in keeping with the gravity
and moral dignity which we might expect from a man of Luther’s
position. Such jests betray a certain levity of character, nor can we
see how certain Lutherans can describe the letter as “scrupulously
decorous.”
It is nevertheless true, and more particularly of this letter, that
the unrestrained humour which so often breaks out in Luther’s writings
must be taken into account in order to judge fairly of what he says;
it is only in this way that we are able to interpret him rightly.
Owing to the fact that the jocose element which, in season and out of
season, so frequently characterises Luther’s manner of speaking is
lost sight of, his real meaning is often misunderstood.
Just as he had urged his friend Spalatin, so, though in more serious
language, Luther exhorts the Elector Albert, Archbishop of Mayence, to
matrimony.
This alone should be a sufficient reason for him, he writes, namely,
that he is a male; “for it is God’s work and will that a man should
have a wife.... Where God does not work a miracle and make of a man
an angel, I cannot see how he is to remain without a wife, and avoid
God’s anger and displeasure. And it is a terrible thing should he be
found without a wife at the hour of death.” He points out to him that
the downfall of the whole clergy is merely a question of time, since
priests are everywhere scoffed at; “priests and monks are caricatured
on every wall, on every bill, and even on the playing cards.” The
sanguinary peasant risings which were commencing are also made to
serve his ends; God is punishing His people in this way because
“the bishops and princes will not make room for the evangel”; the
Archbishop ought therefore to follow the “fine example” given recently
by the “Grand Master in Prussia,” i.e. marry, and “turn the bishopric
into a temporal principality.”[359]
This letter was printed in 1526. Dr. Johann Rühel received
instructions to sound the Archbishop as to his views and seek to
influence him. It is a well-known fact that Albert was more a temporal
potentate than an ecclesiastical dignitary, and that his reputation
was by no means spotless.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account