He admonishes the peasants to suffer in a Christian manner, and to be
ready to endure even persecution and oppression willingly. Such is
the spirit of the evangel which he has always preached. The gospel
made the material life to consist in nothing else but suffering,
injustice, crosses, patience and contempt for all temporal goods,
even life itself. Hence they must not base their earthly claims on
the gospel. “Murderous prophets” had, however, come amongst them who,
by their false interpretation of the Bible, injured the cause of the
gospel and incited men to the use of force, which was forbidden. He
himself had been so successful and yet had abhorred violence, which
made the spread of his doctrine so much the more marvellous. “Now you
interfere,” you wish to help the cause of the evangel, but you “are
damaging it” by your violent action. The effect of these words which
form the central point of his train of thought he destroys by fresh
attacks upon the lords and Princes: If they “forbid the preaching of
the gospel and oppress the people so unbearably, then they deserve
that God should cast them from their thrones.”[543] Luther fancies
he already sees the hands stretched out to execute the sentence, and
concludes by addressing the Princes thus: “Tyrants seldom die in their
beds, as a rule they perish by a bloody death. Since it is certain
that you govern tyrannically and savagely, forbidding the preaching of
the gospel and fleecing and oppressing the people, there is no comfort
or hope for you but to perish as those like you have perished.”[544]
Such words as these were scarcely in place on the very eve of the
terrible struggle. Luther, in his excitement and his anxiety concerning
his teaching, was not a fit judge of the condition of things. It is
true that he fully realised that many of the burdens on account of
which the peasants had risen in revolt were far too oppressive,[545]
and the thoughts which he expresses on this matter are such as might
well be taken to heart for all time. But he places the interests of his
interpretation of the Bible so much in the foreground that he declares,
at the very outset, that what pleased him best in the Peasants’
“Articles,” was their “readiness to be guided by clear, plain,
undeniable passages of Scripture; since it is right and fair that no
man’s conscience should be instructed and guided otherwise than by Holy
Writ.”[546]
Never has the liberty of Bible interpretation been proclaimed under
circumstances more momentous. Luther could not have been ignorant of
the fact, that the armed multitude and their preachers, particularly
the fanatical Anabaptists, had also, like him, set up a new
interpretation of their own of the Bible, one, however, which agreed so
well with their leanings that they would never relinquish it for any
other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account