The denial of free-will seems to him in this regard quite
attractive--such at least is the impression conveyed. For, when we
deny the freedom of the will, so much becomes contradictory and
mysterious to our reason. But so much the better! “Reason speaks
nothing but madness and foolishness, especially concerning holy
things.”[805] “Faith,” so he declares at great length, “has to do
with things that do not appear (Heb. xi. 1); in order that true faith
may enter in, everything that is to be believed must be wrapped in
darkness. But things cannot be more completely concealed than when
what is seemingly contradictory is presented to the mind, to the
senses and to experience.”[806] In the present case, according to
Luther, the apparent injustice of God in the “seemingly unjust”
punishment of sinners, who are not free agents, is a grand motive for
faith in His Justice.[807] Luther here displays his love of paradox.
Even more than in his other writings plentiful opportunity for paradox
presents itself in the “_De servo arbitrio_,” and of it he makes full
use. “God makes alive by putting to death,” he writes in the passage
under consideration, “He renders guilty and thereby justifies; He
drags down the soul to hell and thereby raises it to heaven.”
Among the forcible expressions by which, here as elsewhere, he
attempts to convince both himself and others, that he is in the right,
are the following: “Liberty of choice is a downright lie (‘_merum
mendacium_’).”[808] “Whoever assigns free-will to man, thereby makes
him Divine, and thus commits the worst form of sacrilege.”[809]
“To get rid altogether of the term free-will would be the best and
most pious work (‘_tutissimum et religiosissimum_’).”[810] Whoever
follows the road of Erasmus “is rearing within himself a Lucian--or
a hog of the breed of Epicurus.”[811] “Erasmus concedes even more to
free-will than all the sophists hitherto.”[812] “He denies Christ
more boldly than the Pelagians,”[813] and those who hold with him are
“double-dyed Pelagians, who merely make a pretence of being their
opponents.”[814] But he himself, Luther, had never fallen so low as to
defend free-will: “I have always, up to this very hour, advocated in
my writings the theory that free-will is a mere name.”[815]
In this last assertion he repudiates his Catholic days and refuses
even to take into account the works dating from that time; in his
Commentary on the Psalms he had expressly admitted free-will for doing
what is good and for the choice in the matter of personal salvation;
it is true, however, that he never published this work. But in many
of the writings composed and published even after his apostasy he
had clearly assumed free-will in man and made it the basis of his
practical exhortations, as shown above (p. 239). Now, however, he
prefers to forget all such admissions.[816]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account