To give an affirmative reply to this would call for very strong
proofs, which, in point of fact, are not forthcoming. The passage in
the Latin Table-Talk[932] quoted in justification contains nothing of
the sort, but, strange to say, a very fine exhortation to continence.
For this reason we must again consider it, though it has already
been dealt with. The exhortation commences with the words: “God is
Almighty, Eternal, Merciful, Longsuffering, Chaste, etc. He loves
chastity, purity, modesty. He aids and preserves it by the sacred
institution of marriage in order that [as Paul says] each one may
possess his vessel in sanctification, free from unbridled lust. He
punishes rape, adultery, fornication, incest and secret sins with
infamy and terrible bodily consequences. He warns such sinners that
they shall have no part in the Kingdom of God. Therefore let us
be watchful in prayer,” etc. It is true, however, that this pious
exhortation is set off by frivolous remarks, and it is probably one
of these which suggested the erroneous reference. Luther here speaks
of his young “relative,” Magdalene Kaufmann—a girl of marriageable
age living in his house—and of two other maidens of the same age,
remarking that formerly people had been ready for marriage at an
earlier age than now, but that he was ready to vouch for the fitness
of these three wenches for conjugal work, even to staking his wife on
it, etc. Of any “wicked orgies” we hear nothing whatever. Further, it
is inexact to state, as has been done, that Luther was surrounded in
“his dwelling” by nuns whom he had given a lodging. Neither before
nor after his marriage did they stay with him permanently; as already
stated (vol. ii., p. 138) he either handed over the escaped nuns to
their friends or lodged them in families at Wittenberg. Only on one
occasion, in September, 1525, when in the hurry it was impossible
to find accommodation for a new band of fugitives, did he receive
them temporarily, possibly only for a few days, in the great “Black
Monastery.”[933] There, as he himself then expressed it, he was
“_privatus pater familias_.”
_The Passages “which will not bear repetition.”_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account