The command of the Elector was afterwards to send the learned but
timid man to the Diets, notwithstanding that he was quite unsuited for
political labours on the great stage of the world. We know already
what his feelings were at Spires and then again at Augsburg. His most
recent biographer says of the earlier Diet: “The depression induced
in him by the Protest of Spires and the growth of Zwinglianism,
increased still more during his journey home and the first days after
his return; he felt profoundly downcast and looked forward to the
future with the utmost anxiety. From his standpoint he certainly had
good reason for his fear.”[1220] At Augsburg he suffered so much that
Luther wrote to him: “You torment yourself without respite.... It is
not theology, however, which torments you but your philosophy, and
therefore your fears are groundless.”[1221] And later: “I have been
through greater inward torments than I trust you will ever experience,
and such as I would not wish any man, not even our bitterest opponents
there. And yet, amidst such troubles, I have often been cheered up
by the words of a brother, for instance, Pomeranus, yourself, Jonas,
or some other. Hence, why not listen to us, who speak to you, not
according to the flesh or world, but undoubtedly according to God
and the Holy Ghost?” But you prefer to lean on your philosophy; “Led
away by your reason you act according to your own foolishness and
are killing yourself ... whereas this matter is really beyond us and
must be left to God.” Luther felt convinced that his “prayer for
Melanchthon was most certainly being answered.”[1222]
The hope that Melanchthon would get the better of his depression after
the momentous Diet was over was only partially realised.
The conviction that there was no chance of reunion with the existing
Church, which he had reached at Augsburg, pierced him to the depths
of his soul. “In his quality of theologian,” says Kawerau, “the
thought of the Church’s oneness caused him to endure the bitterest
agonies, particularly between 1530 and 1532”; if certain of the
Catholic leaders sought to draw him over to their side, there was
“some justification for their attempts,” to be accounted for by the
impression he had given at Augsburg, viz. of not being quite at home
among the Evangelicals.[1223] What seemed to confirm this impression,
adds Kawerau, was “that Melanchthon in his printed, and still more in
his epistolary communications, repeatedly gave occasion to people to
think that it might be worth while approaching him with fresh proposals
of conciliation.”[1224]
Of the psychological struggle hinted at by Kawerau, through which he,
who, after Luther, was the chief promoter of the innovations, had to
pass, it is possible to gain many a glimpse from contemporary documents.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account