He adds that he would be ready to defend it even now were things in
the same state as then.—But where did he discern any difference?
According to him, people then, before he had instructed them
concerning its origin and office, had no idea of what secular
authority really was. “Princes and lords who desired to be pious,
looked upon their position and office as of no account, not as being
the service of God, and became mere priests and monks.” But then he
had written his “Von welltlicher Uberkeytt” (1523). Having reinstated
the secular authority, so long “smothered and neglected,” he was loath
to see it summoned against the Turks by the Pope. Besides, he is quite
confident that the Pope had never been in earnest about the Turkish
War; his real aim was to enrich his exchequer.[202]
Luther also explains that from the first he had been inclined to
oppose the granting of any aid against the Turks on the theological
ground embodied in his condemned proposition, viz. that God visits
our sins upon us by means of the Turks. Here again he will not admit
himself to have been in the wrong, for Christians must “endure wrong,
violence or injustice ... not resist evil, but allow and suffer all
things” as the Gospel teaches. Characteristically enough, he appeals
to that “piece of Christian doctrine” according to which the Christian
is to offer his left cheek to him who smites him on the right, and
leave his cloak to the man who takes away his coat. Now, what our
Lord taught in His Sermon on the Mount (Matt. v. 39 f.), was not, as
he had already pointed out, a mere counsel of perfection, but a real
command; but the “Pope with his schools and convents had made of this
a counsel which it was permissible not to keep, and which a Christian
might neglect, and had thus distorted the words of Christ, taught the
whole world a falsehood, and cheated Christians.”[203] A way out of
the fatal consequences which must ensue, Luther fancies he is able to
find in the distinction between the true Christian and mere worldly
citizen; it was not incumbent on the latter to perform everything that
was binding on the former.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account