Your “Squire Luther,” he says to Bora, “behaves himself very
impudently and proudly”; “he fancies he can fly, that he is treading
on roses and is ‘_lux mundi_’”; he forgets that God has commanded us
to keep what we have vowed; people gladly obeyed the Emperor, yet
God was “an Emperor above all Emperors,” and had still more right
to fealty and obedience. Was she ignorant of Christ’s saying: “No
man having put his hand to the plough and looking back is fit for
the Kingdom of God” (Luke ix. 62)? He reminds her of the severe
penalties imposed by the laws of the Empire on those religious who
were openly unfaithful to their vow, and, particularly, of the eternal
punishment which should move her to leave the “horrid, black monk”
(the Augustinians wore a black habit), to bewail like “St. Magdalene
the evil she had done” and, by returning to the convent, to make
“reparation for her infidelity to God.” St. Ambrose’s booklet on the
fallen nun might lead her, and her companions in misfortune, to a
“humble recognition” (of their sin), “and enable her to flee from
the swift wrath of God and return to the fold of Christ, attain to
salvation together with us all and praise the Lord for all eternity.”
We catch a glimpse of the gulf which divided people’s minds at that
time in the very title of the reply by Euricius Cordus: “The Marburg
literary society’s peal of laughter over the screed against Luther of
two Leipzig poets.”[574]
Two satirical and anonymous replies immediately appeared in print at
Wittenberg, the one entitled: “New-Zeittung von Leyptzig,” of which
Luther “was not entirely innocent,” and the other quite certainly his
work, viz. “Ein newe Fabel Esopi newlich verdeudscht gefunden.”[575]
In the first reply spurious epistles are made to relate how the two
Leipzig letters had been brought by a messenger to Luther’s house,
and had then been carried by the servants unread to the “back-chamber
where it stinketh.” “The paper having duly been submitted to the most
ignominious of uses it was again packed into a bundle and despatched
back to the original senders by the same messenger.”[576]
In his “Newe Fabel” (of the Lion and the Ass) Luther implicitly
includes von der Heyden, all the defenders of the Pope, and the Pope
himself under the figure of the Ass (with the cross on its back);
“there is nothing about the Ass that is not worthy of royal and papal
honours.”[577] The author of the letter he calls an ass’s head and
sniveller; the very stones of Leipzig would spit upon him; he was the
“horse-droppings in which the apples were packed”; his art had brought
on him “such an attack of diarrhœa that all of us have been bespattered
with his filth”; “If you wish to devour us, you might begin downstairs
at the commode,” etc.[578]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account