Nor did the progress of the overthrow of the Church throughout the
Duchy bear the least stamp of moral reform. The very violence used
forbids our applying such a term to the work. The Catholic worship at
the Cathedral was at once abolished and replaced by Lutheran services
and preaching. The priests were driven into exile, the bishop alone
being permitted to carry on “his godless papistical abominations and
practices openly in his own residence” (the Castle of Stolpen). At the
demand of the Wittenbergers the professors at Leipzig University who
refused to conform to the Lutheran doctrine were dismissed. Melanchthon
insisted, that, if they refused to hold their tongues, they must be
driven out of the land as “blasphemers.” The new preachers publicly
abused the friends, clerical and lay, of the late Duke to such an
extent that the Estates were moved to make a formal complaint. Churches
and monasteries were plundered and the sacred vessels melted down.[456]
Maurice, the son of Duke Henry, who succeeded in 1541, showed himself
even more violent and relentless in extirpating the olden system.
The profoundly immoral character of this reformation, the interference
with the people’s freedom of conscience, the destruction of religious
traditions which the peaceable inhabitants had received a thousand
years before from holy missionaries and bishops, merely on the strength
of the new doctrines of a man who claimed to have a better Gospel—all
this was expressly sanctioned and supported by Luther.
He wrote in a memorandum on the proceedings: “There is not much room
here for discussion. If my gracious Duke Henry wishes to have the
Evangel, then His Highness must abolish idolatry, or not afford it
protection ... otherwise the wrath of heaven will be too great.” As
a “sovereign appointed by God” the ruler “owed it to Him to put down
such horrible, blasphemous idolatry by every means in his power.” This
was nothing more than “defending Christ and damning the devil”; an
example had been given by the “former kings of Juda and Israel,” who
had abolished “Baal and all his idolatry,” and later by Constantine,
Theodosius and Gratian. For it was as much the duty of princes and
lords as of other people to serve God and the Lord Christ to the
utmost of their power. Away, therefore, with the abbots and bishops
“since they are determined to remain blasphemers ... they are blind
leaders of the blind; God’s wrath has come upon them; hence we must
help in the matter as much as we can.”[457]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account