“On June 27 [1538],” we read, “Dr. Luther and Master Philip were
dining together at his house. They spoke much, with many a sigh,
of the coming times when many dangers would arise.” The greatest
confusion would prevail. No one would then allow himself to be guided
by the doctrine or authority of another. “Each one will wish to be his
own Rabbi, like Osiander and Agricola. From this the worst scandals
and the greatest desolation will come. Hence it would be best [one
said], that the Princes should forestall it by some council, if only
the Papists would not hold back and flee from the light. Master Philip
replied: The Pope will never be brought to hold a General Council....
Oh, that our Princes and the Estates would bring about a council and
some sort of unity in doctrine and worship so as to prevent each one
undertaking something on his own account to the scandal of many, as
some are already doing. The Church is a spectacle of woe, with so much
weakness and scandal heaped upon her.”[607]
Shortly after this Luther instituted a comparison—which for him must
have been very sad—between the “false Church [of the Pope] which
stands erect, a cheerful picture of dignity, strength and holiness,”
and the Church of Christ “which lies in such misery and ignominy, sin
and insignificance as though God had no care for her.” He fancied he
could find some slight comfort in the Article of the Creed: “I believe
in the Holy Church,” for, so he observes, “because we don’t see it,
therefore we believe in it.”[608]
In the midst of the great successes of those years he still gives
utterance to the gloomiest of predictions for the future of his
doctrine, which dissensions would eat to the very core. His pupil
Mathesius reports him as holding forth as follows:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account