In the above instances the Catholic could find support for his
conscience in the infallible authority of the Church. It was this
authority which forbade him Luther’s writings as heretical, and, in the
case of contrition—which Luther also brings forward—it was likewise
his religious faith, which, consonantly with man’s natural feeling,
demanded such sorrow for sin. In earlier days authority and faith were
the reliable guides of conscience without which it was impossible
to do. Luther left conscience to itself or referred it to his own
words and his reading of Scripture, though this again, as he himself
acknowledged, was not an absolute rule; thus he leaves it a prey to
a most unhappy uncertainty—unless, indeed, it was able to “find
assurance” in the way he wishes.
Quite early in his career he also gave the following instruction to
those of the clergy who were living in concubinage on how to form
their conscience; they were “to salve their conscience” and take the
female to their “wedded wife,” even though this were against the law,
fleshly or ghostly. “Your soul’s salvation is of more account than
any tyrannical laws.... Let him who has the faith to take the risk
follow me boldly.” “I will not deceive him,” he adds apologetically,
but at least he had “the power to advise him regarding his sins and
dangers”; he will show them how they may do what they are doing, “but
with a good conscience.”[244] For as Luther points out in another
passage, even though their discarding of their supposed obligation of
celibacy had taken place with a bad conscience, still the Bible-texts
subsequently brought forward, read according to the interpretation
of the new Evangelist, avail to heal their conscience.[245] At any
rate, so he tells the Teutonic Knights when inviting them to break
their vow of chastity: “on the Word of God we will risk it and do it
in the teeth of and contrary to all Councils and Churches! Close eyes
and ears and take God’s Word to heart.”[246] Better, he cries, go on
keeping two or three prostitutes than seek of a Council permission to
marry![247]
These were matters for “those to risk who have the faith,” so we have
heard him say. In reality all did depend on people’s faith ... in
Luther, on their conviction that his doctrine and his moral system
were right.
But what voice was to decide in the case of those who were wavering?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account