Marriage he finds stamped on the whole of nature, “even on the hardest
stones.” New-born infants he assumes capable of eliciting an act of
faith in baptism; simply because he could not otherwise defend against
the Anabaptists the traditional infant baptism and at the same time
maintain that the efficacy of the sacraments depends on faith. His
doctrine of the spiritual omnipresence of the body of Christ is an
absurdity involving the presence of Christ in all food; but even this
is not too much for him if it enables him to defend his theory of the
Supper. His imputation-theory led him to that considered utterance
which has shocked so many: “Be a sinner and sin boldly, but believe
more boldly still.”[528] “_Sic volo, sic iubeo, sit pro ratione
voluntas_,” was elsewhere his answer to another objection.[529]
He made no odds about declaring rhetorically, of all classes of men
and all branches of religious knowledge: that, “in a word, before
me no one knew anything.”[530] Of the daring eloquence he can use
when expressing such ideas we have a sample in the statement: “Were
the Papists, particularly those who are now bawling at me in their
writings, all stamped together in the wine-press and then boiled down
and distilled seven times over, not a quarter would be left capable
of using their tongues to teach even one article [of the Catechism],
nor from the whole of their doctrine could so much be drawn as would
serve to teach a manservant how to behave in God’s sight towards his
master or a maid towards her mistress.”[531] He alone, Luther, it was,
who had brought to all ranks and classes throughout the world “a good
conscience and order.”[532]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account