Under the Pope’s yoke he and all other Papists had been made to feel
to their “great and heavy detriment” what it spelt when one tried
to become pious by means of works. We grew more and more despondent
concerning sin and death.… For the more they do the worse their state
becomes.[661] “Thus I, and all those in the convent, were bondsmen
and captives of Satan.”[662]—“We hoped to find salvation through
our frock.”[663]—With us all it was “rank idolatry,” for I did not
believe in Christ, etc.[664]—Because we endured so many “sufferings
of heart and conscience and performed so many works,” no one must now
come and seek to excuse Popery.[665]—“We fled from Christ as from the
very devil, for we were taught that each one would be placed before
the judgment seat of Christ with his works”[666]—a teaching which is,
indeed, almost word for word that of St. Paul (2 Cor. v. 10).
Remembering the other utterances in which he makes all Papists share
in his alleged experiences, for instance, in his “unbelief,” we soon
perceive how unreliable are all such statements of his concerning the
history of his personal development. The whole is seen to be primarily
but a new form of controversy and self-vindication; only by dint
of cautious criticism can we extract from it certain traits which
possibly serve to illustrate the course of his mental growth in the
monastery.
Again, several details of the picture—quite apart from the obvious
effort to burden the olden Church with a monstrous system of
holiness-by-works—warn us to be sceptical. First of all there is the
customary rhetoric and playing to the gallery. The palpable exaggeration
it contains, its references to the howling by day and by night, to the
scourgings, to the tortures of hunger and cold, to the endless prayers
and watchings, and to the ravings of the woebegone searchers after peace,
do not prepossess us in favour of the truth of the account. Luther, in so
much of what he says on the point, has shown us how little he is to be
taken seriously, that one cannot but wonder how his statements, even when
exaggerated to the verge of the ludicrous, can ever have been regarded in
the light of real authorities.
He is not telling the truth when he assures us that, as Doctor of
Divinity, he had never rightly understood the Ten Commandments, and
that many other famous doctors had not known “whether there were
nine, or ten, or eleven of them; much less did we know anything
of the Gospel or of Christ.”[667] After outward works, indeed, we
ran, but “what God has commanded, that we omitted … for the Papists
trouble themselves about neither the Commandments nor the promises
of God.”[668] In choir the community daily chanted Psalm li. (l.),
in which joy in the Lord is extolled, but “there was not one who
understood what joy to the pious is a firm trust in God’s Mercy.”[669]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account