Thomas Aquinas declares: “Abstinence from food and drink in itself
does not promote salvation,” according to Rom. xiv. 17, where we read:
“The kingdom of heaven is not meat and drink.” He recognises only the
medicinal value of fasting and abstinence, and points out that by
such practices “concupiscence is kept in check”; hence he deduces the
necessity of discretion (“_ad modicum_”) and warns people against the
“vain glory” and other faults which may result from these practices.
Not by such works, nor by any works whatsoever, is a man saved and
justified, but “man’s salvation and justice,” so he teaches, “consist
mainly in inward acts of faith, of hope and of charity, and not in
outward ones.… Man may scorn all measure where faith, hope and charity
are concerned, but, in outward acts, he must make use of the measure
of discretion.”[674]
But perhaps the best ascetical writer to refer to in this connection
is John Gerson of Paris, who was so much read in the monasteries and
with whom Luther was well acquainted. He assigns to outward works,
particularly to severe acts of penance, the place they had, even from
the earliest times, held in the Church. He bids Religious care above
all for inward virtue, which they are to regard as the main thing, for
self-denial and for obedience out of love of God. He appeals to the
Fathers and warns his readers that “indiscreet abstinence may more
easily lead to a bad end than even over-feeding.” Discretion could not
be better practised than in humility and obedience, by forsaking one’s
own notions and submitting to the advice of the expert; such obedience
was never more in place than in a Religious.[675]
These are but two notable witnesses taken from the endless tale of those
whose testimony is at variance with the charges implied in Luther’s
legend, that the monks were regardless of discretion where penance was
concerned.
That Luther is guilty of self-contradiction in attributing to the
Catholic teachers and monks of his day such mistaken views and practices
and the doctrine of holiness-by-works generally is fairly obvious.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account