Yet mystical effusions are intermingled with charges against the
opponents of his new philosophy and theology which are by no means
remarkable for humility. “For nothing do my fingers itch so much,”
he wrote about this time,[705] “as to tear off the mask from that
clown Aristotle.” The words here uttered by the monk, as yet scarcely
more than a pupil himself, refer to a scholar to whom even the
greatest have ever looked up, and, who, up till then, had worthily
represented at the Universities the wisdom of the ancients. The young
man declares, that “he would willingly call him a devil, did he not
know that he had had a body.” Luther also has a low opinion of all the
Universities of his day: “They condemn and burn the good books,” he
exclaims, “while fabricating and framing bad ones.”[706]
Self-confidence had been kindled in the monk’s breast by a conviction
of future greatness. He speaks several times of this inkling he had
whilst yet a secular student at the Erfurt University; when ailing
from some illness of which we have no detailed account, the father of
one of his friends cheered him with certain words which sank deeply
into his memory: “My dear Bachelor, don’t lose heart, you will live to
be a great man yet.” In 1532 Luther related to his pupil Veit Dietrich
this utterance which he still treasured in his memory.[707] How
strong an impression such lightly spoken words could make on his too
susceptible mind is evident from a letter of 1530 where he speaks of
his vivid recollection of another man, who, when Luther was consoling
him on the death of his son, had said to him: “Martin, you may be sure
that some day you will be a great man.” Since, on the same occasion,
he goes on to refer to the remark made by Staupitz, viz. that he was
called to do great things, and declares that this prediction had been
verified, it becomes even clearer that this idea had taken root and
thriven in his mind even from early years.[708] But how does all this
harmonise with the humility of the true religious, and with the pious
self-forgetfulness of the mystic? There can be no doubt that it is
more in accordance with the quarrelsomeness and exclusiveness, the hot
temper and lack of consideration for others to which the testimonies
already recorded have repeatedly borne witness. (Above, vol. i.,
_passim_.)
There is a document in existence, on which so far but little attention
has been bestowed, which is characteristic of his language at one time.
Its tone of exaggeration makes it worthy to rank side by side with the
mystical passage quoted above, in which Luther professes to have himself
experienced the pangs of hell which were the earthly lot of chosen
souls.[709] Owing to its psychological value this witness to his humility
must not be passed over.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account