Luther himself, too, had been obliged on various occasions to justify the
severity of his opinions.
_Luther’s Self-justification and Excuses_
Philip of Hesse, though he treated Catholics with the utmost intolerance,
refused to hear of punishing the Anabaptists with death unless indeed
they were the cause of public disturbances. “We cannot find it in our
conscience to put anyone to death by the sword on account of religion
unless we have sufficient proof of other crimes as well.” Such was the
declaration he made in 1532 to Elector Johann of Saxony, and which
he emphasised in 1545 to the latter’s successor: “Were all those to
be executed who are not of our faith what then should we do to the
Papists, to say nothing of the Jews, who err even more greatly than the
Anabaptists?”[903]
Luther was apparently far surer of his case. He is as confident,
subsequent to 1530, in drawing from Scripture the principles for the
treatment of the heretics as he is in defending them against the obvious
objections so often brought against them.
Luther had it that the line of action for which he stood was not coercion
to any definite religious practices. “Our Princes,” so he sought to
reassure himself as early as 1525, “do not force people to the faith and
to the Evangel but merely set a term to outward abominations.”[904]
The Elector, as was to be expected, expressed himself likewise: “Though
it is not our intention to prescribe to anyone what he must hold or
believe, yet, in order to guard against harmful uprisings and other
disorders, we refuse to recognise or permit any sects or schisms within
our Princedom.”[905]
Many a one amongst the new Doctors had begun, as a Protestant
historian of Saxony points out,[906] “to claim for his conscience the
same right” (as Luther), while “following other paths than Luther
had trodden” (in his search after God). May not, indeed, must not,
such a one, so ran the objection, follow his conscience, seeing that
Luther himself tells us to consult our conscience? Yes, he may, is
Luther’s reply, but, if he be truthful, then he will admit my plain
interpretation of the Bible as the right one, for “I have floored and
overcome all my foes on the sure groundwork of Holy Scripture.”[907]
Moreover, might not the Princes holding Popish views seize on the
coercion taught by the Lutherans as a pretext for similar measures
against the Lutherans in their territories?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account