But how is a man to be so certain in his heart as to be able to come
forward in this way? “You can then be certain of the matter if you
are able to decide freely and surely and to say this is the pure
and simple truth, for it I will live or die, and whoever teaches
otherwise, whatsoever be his title and standing, is accursed.”[1141]
It would be a waste of words to point out that this was to deal a
death-blow at the olden conception of the Church.
Startling, nay, utterly stupefying, is the sharp contrast all this
presents to Luther’s later attitude already described above (pp. 241,
251, 262). There we have a rigid, coercive Church held fast in the ban
of the Wittenberg doctrine, whereas here, in the days of the early
development of Lutheranism, we find an exuberant wealth of individual
freedom which scoffs even at the possibility of any ecclesiastical order.
Only a dreamer and hot-head like Luther could have seen in such an
individualism, where each one is teacher and priest, anything else than
chaos.
Luther’s expectations in those early days were strange indeed and
quite incapable of realisation; not only were all delusions to be
excluded but everything, as he says of the enduring of opposition,
was to be done “decently and piously”! If he is really speaking in
earnest, then he shows himself a hermit utterly ignorant of human
nature. And yet even in the seclusion of the convent walls, the
greatest enthusiast should have seen that this was not the way to form
a congregation on earth of believers, or anything resembling a Church.
We can, nevertheless, easily understand, to cite Möhler in
confirmation of what has been said, “how the doctrine in question
could, nay, had to, arise in Luther’s mind: Since the authority of the
existing Church was against him he had perforce to seek for support
in the authority of God working directly in him.… He saw no other way
than to appeal to an intangible, inward authorisation.”[1142]—This he
then proceeded to work out into a system for the other believers.
“In the fashion of the true demagogue he flatters every Christian
and invests him with such perfection as any unprejudiced mind must
repudiate on the most cursory glance into his own heart.”[1143]
The truth is, the doctrine put forward by Luther against the Church,
i.e. that Holy Scripture is the sole judge, has no meaning except on
the assumption of a certainty through direct divine illumination.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account