Lynch-law; an investigation into the history of lynching in the United StatesCutler, James Elbert
Philosophy
Lynch-law; an investigation into the history of lynching in the United States
Cutler, James Elbert
Lynching -- United States
It cannot be said, however, that these cases of the infliction of
capital punishment upon negroes without process of law were anything
more than sporadic and isolated cases. They were scarcely more than
local in their influence. The most important thing brought to light by
the above comparison of the two ten-year periods is the tendency, in the
later period, toward less reliance on legal procedure and toward greater
readiness on the part of the people to take matters into their own
hands. The newspapers in the fifties not only frequently excused summary
procedure but often openly advocated it. One instance only will be cited
and it is from a southern newspaper. In 1856, a Mr. Pearce, residing in
Morgan County, Georgia, attempted to give one of his negroes a flogging
for some misdemeanor. The negro picked up an ax and at one blow split
his master’s head open. He then fled. While he was still at large the
Madison Messenger printed the following: “Beyond doubt he will be
captured before many hours. If he is, although we admire submission to
the course pointed out by the law of the land, in this case so much of
the brute has been manifested, we should be glad to see our citizens
rise _en masse_, and avail themselves of Lynch law, and hang the rascal
without court or jury.”[191]
The preceding paragraphs have made it clear that negroes occasionally
suffered death under lynch-law previous to the Civil War. It was not
common, however, to characterize the summary hanging of negroes as
lynching. Such occurrences were neither common nor general enough to
give to the verb lynch its modern meaning, even though they had been
always designated as lynchings.
It was with reference to the lawless proceedings which took place in the
western and southwestern portions of the United States in the fifties
that the term lynch was first used in its modern sense. The vigilance
committees which were then common in that section of the country often
hung desperadoes and horse-thieves, and frequently when such persons
were thus executed they were said to have been lynched. A paragraph in
the Liberator, November 9, 1860 (p. 179), has the heading: “Four men
Lynched in Texas.” The paragraph contains a clipping from a Texas paper
describing the circumstances under which four men were found one morning
hung in the public square of a town in Navarro County, and refers to the
“many accounts of lynchings in Texas.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account