Macaulay's Life of Samuel Johnson, with a Selection from his Essay on JohnsonMacaulay, Thomas Babington Macaulay, Baron
General
Macaulay's Life of Samuel Johnson, with a Selection from his Essay on Johnson
Macaulay, Thomas Babington Macaulay, Baron
Johnson, Samuel, 1709-1784
10. This liberal patronage was brought into fashion, as it
seems, by the magnificent Dorset, almost the only noble versifier
in the court of Charles the Second who possessed talents
for composition which were independent of the aid of a coronet.
Montague owed his elevation to the favour of Dorset, and 15
imitated through the whole course of his life the liberality to
which he was himself so greatly indebted. The Tory leaders,
Harley and Bolingbroke in particular, vied with the chiefs of
the Whig party in zeal for the encouragement of letters. But
soon after the accession of the House of Hanover a change 20
took place. The supreme power passed to a man who cared
little for poetry or eloquence. The importance of the House
of Commons was constantly on the increase. The government
was under the necessity of bartering for Parliamentary support
much of that patronage which had been employed in fostering 25
literary merit; and Walpole was by no means inclined to
divert any part of the fund of corruption to purposes which he
considered as idle. He had eminent talents for government
and for debate. But he had paid little attention to books,
and felt little respect for authors. One of the coarse jokes of 30
his friend, Sir Charles Hanbury Williams, was far more pleasing
to him than Thomson's Seasons or Richardson's Pamela.
He had observed that some of the distinguished writers
whom the favour of Halifax had turned into statesmen had
been mere encumbrances to their party, dawdlers in office,
and mutes in Parliament. During the whole course of his
administration, therefore, he scarcely befriended a single man
of genius. The best writers of the age gave all their support
to the opposition, and contributed to excite that discontent 5
which, after plunging the nation into a foolish and unjust war,
overthrew the minister to make room for men less able and
equally immoral. The opposition could reward its eulogists
with little more than promises and caresses. St. James's would
give nothing: Leicester House had nothing to give. 10
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account