Machine-Gun TacticsApplin, R. V. K. (Reginald Vincent Kempenfeldt)
History
Machine-Gun Tactics
Applin, R. V. K. (Reginald Vincent Kempenfeldt)
Machine guns
This chapter would not be complete without some reference to the
use of machine guns in enclosed country such as is found in the
United Kingdom. Clery, in his _Minor Tactics_, p. 118, says that
cultivated country is the most favourable to the attack, while in
defence the country to the front cannot be too open. “In the first,
infantry gains a succession of covered positions by means of which
it comes on more equal terms with the defence. In the second, the
infantry of the defence has a clear field to destroy the assailants
as they approach.”
Apart from civil war, the only possible occasion for the use of
machine guns in the British Isles is against an invader, and it
is well known to students of modern war that the prospects of a
successful invasion do not depend upon the strength or weakness of
our fleet, but on that of our army for home defence. The duty of a
fleet in time of war is to go to sea and destroy the enemy’s ships,
and while it is absent on this mission an opportunity for invasion
may occur, the success of which will wholly depend upon the force
the invader will meet on landing.
The Japanese recently landed in Manchuria in spite of Russia’s
superior naval strength; but because it was the case of an island
invading a continent, we do not apply the lesson to ourselves, and
are content to believe that a continent cannot invade an island.
It is obvious to the military student that no invasion will be
attempted unless its success is reasonably certain, and the
presence of four divisions of regular troops at home renders such
an enterprise extremely difficult, if not impossible, without
permanent command of the sea. But these four divisions are not
the Home Defence Force, and form that part of our Expeditionary
Army for service outside the United Kingdom. We may, therefore,
rest assured that as long as we retain command of the sea, no
invasion can take place until we are involved in an over-seas war
which requires a more or less large portion of our Expeditionary
Force--an event which has happened almost every decade.
It will be safe, therefore, to assume that in the event of an
invasion we shall have to rely on our Territorial Army to meet the
enemy, and it will be doing this force no injustice to assume that
they will be compelled to act on the defensive in the face of a
highly trained and disciplined Continental Army. Indeed, it is
difficult for a soldier to realise how a Volunteer force, trained
for fourteen days in the year and unacquainted with military
discipline, can hope to meet on equal terms, even if superior by
three to one in numbers, the pick of Continental manhood trained
under an iron discipline for the minimum of two years.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account