Madame Roland: A Biographical StudyTarbell, Ida M. (Ida Minerva)
History
Madame Roland: A Biographical Study
Tarbell, Ida M. (Ida Minerva)
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799; Roland, Madame, 1754-1793
Nothing intimidated him. He followed up the proposition for a guard by a
demand for a decree against those who provoked to murder and
assassination. Systematically he refused to believe in the sincerity of
Robespierre and Danton,—they were usurpers aiming at dictatorship. When
in March they sought to organize a revolutionary tribunal, Buzot,
furious and trembling, declared to the Convention that he was weary of
despotism. He signalled the abuses that were made all over France by the
revolutionary bodies, and violently attacked members of the Jacobin
society and of the Mountain, denouncing them as infamous wretches, as
assassins of the country. It was not only murder of which he accused
them,—it was corruption. “Sudden and scandalous fortunes” were noted
among the Terrorists in the Convention,—and he demanded that each deputy
give the condition and origin of his fortune.
In all these measures Buzot was in harmony with Roland, and he fought
the minister’s cause in the Convention so far as possible. Indeed, it
came to be a sort of personal resentment he showed when Roland was
attacked in the body, and once he went so far that they cried out to
him, “It is not you we are talking about.” It was a lover’s jealousy
against anything which harmed his lady.
But while attacking the Terrorists Buzot was obliged to prove his
patriotism, to show that he was a republican, and a hater of the
monarchy. He did it by radical measures. While insisting on an armed
force to protect the Convention, he demanded the perpetual banishment of
the _émigrés_, and their death if they set foot in France. A few weeks
later he demanded that whosoever should propose the re-establishment of
royalty in France, under whatsoever denomination, should be punished by
death; afterwards he asked the banishment of all the Bourbons, not
excepting Philippe of Orleans, then sitting in the Convention.
When it came to the question of the death of Louis XVI., Buzot wished
that the King be heard and not condemned immediately; when he came to
vote, it was for his death with delay and a _referendum_ that he
decided.
But no amount of violence against the royalists could now prove him a
patriot. That which made a patriot in the fall of 1792 was an altogether
different thing from what made one in the spring of 1792. Buzot, with
the Gironde, was suspected. It was not enough that he opposed the old
régime and approved a Republic, he must approve the vengeance of
Terrorism and support the Terrorists. But he could not do it. He was
revolted by the awful excess, and he underwent a physical repulsion
which was almost feminine and made any union with the party impossible,
whatever the demands of politics were.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account