Mafeking : $b a diary of the siegeBaillie, Frederick David
History
Mafeking : $b a diary of the siege
Baillie, Frederick David
Mafikeng (South Africa) -- History -- Siege, 1899-1900; South African War, 1899-1902
1st May, Tuesday. We expect a mail to-day, and this dashing fellow
Eloff promised us another attack. He has made it. It was the usual
sort of performance, and they blazed away for two or three hours and
didn’t hit anybody. I got up and looked on, because I felt I ought to,
but I was rather cross and very bored. If the fools want to fight, why
don’t they do it? They are doing themselves no good, and not attaining
any object whatsoever. Colonel Baden-Powell told them some months ago
they would not take Mafeking "by sitting and looking at the place," but
even now, if they would sacrifice two or three thousand men, they might
get in, but I am afraid they will never try. They make me quite angry,
they are so stupid. Here they are, daily losing one or two men, and the
greatest success they can show is a few stolen cows, whereas if they
would come on and fight properly they wouldn’t lose very many more men
than they have already, and we should have a chance of a show.
Seriously speaking though, it is their duty to take this place, and it
is very disheartening waiting for them to try to. We got our pigeon
mails to-day; unfortunately, no news whatsoever. We have not received
any decisive news or had any optimistic rumour confirmed for weeks, and
in fact our last good news is Cronje’s mop up. Isn’t there an old
figure in some square dance or other called the _chassez croissee_? It
seems to be fashionable out here. I don’t like square dances or slow
generals. As I telegraphed to you this morning my general sensation is
that of an aching void. The only satisfaction I can derive therefrom is
the certainty that most of my friends and acquaintances will be much
amused at my being kept quiet anywhere on short commons. Tom Greenfield
is looking terribly hungry, but then with his length he naturally takes
more filling up than ordinary mortals. Godley, too, looks as if he could
do with a bit more, but he always is thin. We have got a very tall lot
of men here, Cecil, Tom Greenfield, Godley, Fitzclarence, Bentinck, all
make an ordinary six-foot individual feel small, and McKenna isn’t
exactly short. If we have length represented we also have breadth,
which even our present rations are unable to reduce. I am certainly not
going to quote a nominal roll of these individuals, as they are fine
strong men and I can’t get away.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account