Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical IntroductionMcKechnie, William Sharp
History
Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical Introduction
McKechnie, William Sharp
Constitutional history -- England -- Sources; Law -- England -- History; Law -- England -- Sources; Magna Carta
(3) _Provision against a recurrence of the waste._ It was only fair that
reasonable precautions should be taken to prevent the heir who had
already suffered hurt, from being similarly abused a second time. John,
accordingly, promised to supersede the keeper guilty of waste by
appointing as guardians two of the most trustworthy of the free-holders
on the heir’s estate. These men, from their local and personal ties to
the young heir, might be expected to deal tenderly with his property.
The “unknown Charter,” already referred to, proposed a more drastic
remedy. Whenever the Crown’s right to a wardship opened, the lands were
to be entrusted to four knights of the fief without waiting until damage
had been done. This suggestion, if carried out, would have protected the
king’s wards, without injury to the legitimate pecuniary interests of
the Crown.
CHAPTER FIVE.
Custos autem, quamdiu custodiam terre habuerit, sustentet domos, parcos,
vivaria, stagna, molendina, et cetera ad terram illam pertinencia, de
exitibus terre ejusdem; et reddat heredi, cum ad plenam etatem
pervenerit, terram suam totam instauratam de carrucis et waynagiis,
secundum quod tempus waynagii exiget et exitus terre racionabiliter
poterunt sustinere.
The guardian, moreover, so long as he has the wardship of the land,
shall keep up the houses, parks, places for live-stock,[397]
fishponds, mills, and other things pertaining to the land, out of the
issues of the same land; and he shall restore to the heir, when he has
come to full age, all his land, stocked with ploughs and implements of
husbandry, according as the season of husbandry shall require, and the
issues of the land can reasonably bear.
-----
Footnote 397:
_Vivarium_ in strictness means a place for keeping live-stock, but
probably included the animals also. By Coke, in the _Statutes at
large_, and elsewhere, it is translated “warren”; but that word has
its Latin form in _warrena_. Stubbs’ Glossary to _Select Charters_ (p.
551) renders it as “a fish pond,” but _stagnum_ has that meaning. The
Statute Westminster II. (c. 47) speaks of _stagnum molendinæ_ (a
mill-pond). The Statute of Merton (c. 11) refers to poachers taken _in
parcis et vivariis_; while Westminster I. (c. 1) forbids _ne courge en
autri parks, ne pesche en autri vivers_, which suggests a change of
connotation. Cf. _ibid._, c. 20.
-----
These stipulations form the complement, on the positive side, of the
purely negative provisions of chapter 4. It was not sufficient to
prohibit acts of waste; the guardian must see that the estates were kept
in good repair.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account