Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical IntroductionMcKechnie, William Sharp
History
Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical Introduction
McKechnie, William Sharp
Constitutional history -- England -- Sources; Law -- England -- History; Law -- England -- Sources; Magna Carta
_Geoffrey de Mandeville_, 356.
-----
Henry II., indeed, granted a charter to the citizens in 1155, which is
usually interpreted as a full confirmation of all the concessions of the
earlier Henry.[482] Mr. Round has conclusively proved the error of this
opinion.[483] The charter of 1155 restricted, rather than enlarged, the
privileges of London, being couched in cautious and somewhat grudging
terms. The main concessions of the earlier charter were completely
omitted: the citizens no longer elected their own sheriffs or their own
justiciar; the reduction of the _firma_ to £300 was not confirmed; and
subsequent pipe rolls show that Henry doubled that amount, although the
Londoners protested, arguing for the lower rate.
-----
Footnote 482:
See _e.g._ Miss Norgate, _Angevin Kings_, II. 471.
Footnote 483:
_Geoffrey_, 367.
-----
The next crisis came early in Richard’s reign. Then it was that London
first obtained its municipal constitution. Then also it regained and
secured on a permanent basis the privileges precariously held for a few
years under Henry I. and Stephen. The form in which the constitution
came at last was borrowed from France, and was neither more nor less
than the _Commune_, so well known on the Continent in the twelfth and
thirteenth centuries. The commune of London was possibly modelled upon
the commune of Rouen; the chief cities of England and Normandy
respectively must have had intimate relations. Mr. Round[484] has shown
that these concessions were not, as has sometimes been supposed,
voluntarily granted in 1189 by Richard I., but were extorted from his
younger brother John, when that ambitious prince was bidding high for
powerful allies to support his claim to act as Regent. London really got
its first constitution on 8th October, 1191, under picturesque and
memorable circumstances. While Richard tarried in the Holy Land, a
scramble took place at home for the right to represent him. The
Chancellor Longchamp had been appointed Regent; but John, wily and
unscrupulous, successfully ousted him, with the help of the men of
London. At the critical moment the metropolis had offered its support on
conditions, which included the restoration of all the short-lived
privileges conferred by the charter of Henry I., and, in addition, a
municipal constitution of its own in the form of a commune of the
continental type.
-----
Footnote 484:
_Commune of London_, 222.
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account