Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. MahanMahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
History
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Mahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
Naval art and science; Naval strategy; Sea-power
This analogy of positions was not overlooked by England. From that time
forward up to our own day, the possessions won for her by her sea power
have combined with that sea power itself to control her policy. The road
to India—in the days of Clive a distant and perilous voyage on which she
had not a stopping-place of her own—was reinforced as opportunity
offered by the acquisition of St. Helena, of the Cape of Good Hope, of
the Mauritius. When steam made the Red Sea and Mediterranean route
practicable, she acquired Aden, and yet later has established herself at
Socotra. Malta had already fallen into her hands during the wars of the
French Revolution; and her commanding position, as the corner-stone upon
which the coalitions against Napoleon rested, enabled her to claim it at
the Peace of 1815. Being but a short thousand miles from Gibraltar, the
circles of military command exercised by these two places intersect. The
present day has seen the stretch from Malta to the Isthmus of Suez,
formerly without a station, guarded by the cession to her of Cyprus.
Egypt, despite the jealousy of France, has passed under English control.
The importance of that position to India, understood by Napoleon and
Nelson, led the latter at once to send an officer overland to Bombay
with the news of the battle of the Nile and the downfall of Bonaparte’s
hopes. Even now, the jealousy with which England views the advance of
Russia in Central Asia is the result of those days in which her sea
power and resources triumphed over the weakness of D’Aché and the genius
of Suffren, and wrenched the peninsula of India from the ambition of the
French.
“For the first time since the Middle Ages,” says M. Martin, speaking of
the Seven Years’ War, “England had conquered France single-handed almost
without allies, France having powerful auxiliaries. She had conquered
solely by the superiority of her government.”
Yes! but by the superiority of her government using the tremendous
weapon of her sea power. This made her rich and in turn protected the
trade by which she had her wealth. With her money she upheld her few
auxiliaries, mainly Prussia and Hanover, in their desperate strife. Her
power was everywhere that her ships could reach, and there was none to
dispute the sea to her. Where she would she went, and with her went her
guns and her troops. By this mobility her forces were multiplied, those
of her enemies distracted. Ruler of the seas, she everywhere obstructed
its highways. The enemies’ fleets could not join; no great fleet could
get out, or if it did, it was only to meet at once, with uninured
officers and crews, those who were veterans in gales and warfare. Save
in the case of Minorca, she carefully held her own sea bases and eagerly
seized those of the enemy. What a lion in the path was Gibraltar to the
French squadrons of Toulon and Brest! What hope for French succor to
Canada, when the English fleet had Louisburg under its lee?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account