Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. MahanMahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
History
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Mahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
Naval art and science; Naval strategy; Sea-power
Committed as the Danes were to a stationary defense, this recommendation
to strike at the soul of the confederacy evinced the clearest perception
of the key to the situation, which Nelson himself summed up in the
following words: “I look upon the Northern League to be like a tree, of
which Paul was the trunk and Sweden and Denmark the branches. If I can
get at the trunk and hew it down, the branches fall of course; but I may
lop the branches and yet not be able to fell the tree, and my power must
be weaker when its greatest strength is required”[69]—that is, the
Russians should have been attacked before the fleet was weakened, as it
inevitably must be, by the battle with the Danes. “If we could have cut
up the Russian fleet,” he said again, “that was my object.” Whatever
Denmark’s wishes about fighting, she was by her continental possessions
tied to the policy of Russia and Prussia, either of whom could overwhelm
her by land. She dared not disregard them. The course of both depended
upon the czar; for the temporizing policy of Prussia would at once
embrace his withdrawal from the league as an excuse for doing the same.
At Revel were twelve Russian ships-of-the-line, fully half their Baltic
fleet, whose destruction would have paralyzed the remainder and the
naval power of the empire. To persuade Parker to such a step was,
however, hopeless. “Our fleet would never have acted against Russia and
Sweden,” wrote Nelson afterwards, “although Copenhagen would have been
burned; for Sir Hyde Parker was determined not to leave Denmark hostile
in his rear;”[70] a reason whose technical accuracy under all the
circumstances was nothing short of pedantic, and illustrates the immense
distance between a good and accomplished officer, which Parker was, and
a genius whose comprehension of rules serves only to guide, not to
fetter, his judgment.
Although unable to rise equal to the great opportunity indicated by
Nelson, Sir Hyde Parker adopted his suggestion as to the method and
direction of the principal attack upon the defenses of Copenhagen. For
this, Nelson asked ten ships-of-the-line and a number of smaller
vessels, with which he undertook to destroy the floating batteries
covering the front of the city. These being reduced, the bomb vessels
could be placed so as to play with effect upon the dockyard, arsenals,
and the town, in case further resistance was made.
[The fleet entered the Sound and anchored off Copenhagen on March 26. On
April 2 Nelson attacked from the southward as he had suggested, and
after a hard-fought battle forced a fourteen weeks’ armistice which
practically secured the British aims, since it gave opportunity to
proceed against Sweden and Russia. Nelson was given chief command on May
5, and two days later sailed for Revel, but the death of the Czar Paul
had already brought a favorable change in Russia’s policy and made
further action unnecessary.—EDITOR.]
24. ENGLAND’S FIRST LINE OF DEFENSE[71]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account