Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. MahanMahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
History
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Mahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
Naval art and science; Naval strategy; Sea-power
These two simultaneous operations, the transport of troops despite the
fleet in being, and the persevering effort at the same time to destroy
it—or neutralize it—illustrate what I have called adjustment between
opposite considerations. The danger from the fleet in being is
recognized, but so also is the danger in delaying the initiation of the
land campaign. The Fleet in Being School would condemn the
transportation, so long as the Port Arthur fleet existed. It actually
did so condemn it. The London _Times_, which is, or then was, under the
influence of this school, published six weeks before the war began a
summary of the situation, by naval and military correspondents, in which
appears this statement: “With a hostile fleet behind the guns at Port
Arthur, the Japanese could hardly venture to send troops into the Yellow
Sea.” And again, four weeks later: “It is obvious that, until the
Russian ships are sunk, captured, or shut up in their ports with their
wings effectually clipped, there can be no security for the sea
communications of an expeditionary force.” These are just as clear
illustrations of the exaggeration inherent in the Fleet in Being theory,
which assumes the deterrent influence of an offensive threatened by
inferior force, as the conduct of the Russian naval operations was of
the inefficiency latent in their theory of Fortress Fleet.
If security meant the security of peace, these Fleet in Being statements
could be accepted; but military security is an entirely different thing;
and we know that, coincidently with the first torpedo attack, before its
result could be known, an expeditionary Japanese force was sent into the
Yellow Sea to Chemulpo, and that it rapidly received reinforcements to
the estimated number of fifty or sixty thousand. The enterprise in
Manchuria, the landing of troops west of the mouth of the Yalu, was
delayed for some time—two months, more or less. What the reason of that
delay, and what determined the moment of beginning, I do not know; but
we do know, not only that it was made in face of four Russian
battleships within Port Arthur, but that it continued in face of the
increase of their number to six by the repair of those damaged in the
first torpedo attack. As early as May 31, it was known in Tokyo that the
damaged ships were nearly ready for the sortie, which they actually made
on June 23.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account