Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. MahanMahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
History
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Mahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
Naval art and science; Naval strategy; Sea-power
To protract such a situation is intolerable to the purse and _morale_ of
the belligerent who has the disadvantage of position. This of course
leads us straight back to the fundamental principles of all naval war,
namely, that defense is ensured only by offense, and that the one
decisive objective of the offensive is the enemy’s organized force, his
battle fleet. Therefore, in the event of a war between one of the
Channel Powers, and one or more of those to the eastward, the control of
the North Sea must be at once decided. For the eastern State it is a
matter of obvious immediate necessity, of commercial self-preservation.
For the western State the offensive motive is equally imperative; but
for Great Britain there is defensive need as well. Her Empire imposes
such a development of naval force as makes it economically impracticable
to maintain an army as large as those of the Continent. Security against
invasion depends therefore upon the fleet. Postponing more distant
interests, she must here concentrate an indisputable superiority. It is,
however, inconceivable that against any one Power Great Britain should
not be able here to exert from the first a preponderance which would
effectually cover all her remoter possessions. Only an economical
decadence, which would of itself destroy her position among nations,
could bring her so to forego the initial advantage she has, in the fact
that for her offense and defense meet and are fulfilled in one factor,
the command of the sea. History has conclusively demonstrated the
inability of a state with even a single continental frontier to compete
in naval development with one that is insular, although of smaller
population and resources. A coalition of Powers may indeed affect the
balance. As a rule, however, a single state against a coalition holds
the interior position, the concentrated force; and while calculation
should rightly take account of possibilities, it should beware of
permitting imagination too free sway in presenting its pictures. Were
the eastern Powers to combine they might prevent Great Britain’s use of
the North Sea for the safe passage of her merchant shipping; but even so
she would but lose commercially the whole of a trade, the greater part
of which disappears by the mere fact of war. Invasion is not possible,
unless her fleet can be wholly disabled from appearing in that sea. From
her geographical position, she still holds her gates open to the outer
world, which maintains three fourths of her commerce in peace.
37. BEARING OF POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS ON NAVAL POLICY AND STRATEGY[115]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account