Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. MahanMahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
History
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Mahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
Naval art and science; Naval strategy; Sea-power
There is another sense in which a navy is regarded as defensive; namely,
that the existence of an adequate navy protects from invasion by
commanding the sea. That is measurably and in very large degree true,
and is a strategic function of great importance; but this is a wholly
different question from that of the defensive strength of seaports, of
strategic points, with which we are now dealing. It therefore will be
postponed, with a simple warning against the opinion that because the
navy thus defends there is no need for local protection of the strategic
ports; no need, that is, for fortifications. This view affirms that a
military force can always, under all circumstances, dispense with secure
bases of operations; in other words, that it can never be evaded, nor
know momentary mishap.
I have now put before you reasons for rejecting the opinion that the
navy is the proper instrument, generally speaking, for coast defense in
the narrow sense of the expression, which limits it to the defense of
ports. The reasons given may be summed up, and reduced to four
principles, as follows:
1. That for the same amount of offensive power, floating batteries, or
vessels of very little mobility, are less strong defensively against
naval attack than land works are.
2. That by employing able-bodied seafaring men to defend harbors you
lock up offensive strength in an inferior, that is, in a defensive,
effort.
3. That it is injurious to the _morale_ and skill of seamen to keep them
thus on the defensive and off the sea. This has received abundant
historical proof in the past.
4. That in giving up the offensive the navy gives up its proper sphere,
which is also the most effective.
B. _Offensive Strength._—The offensive strength of a seaport, considered
independently of its strategic situation and of its natural and acquired
resources, consists in its capacity:
1. To assemble and hold a large military force, of both ships of war and
transports.
2. To launch such force safely and easily into the deep.
3. To follow it with a continued support until the campaign is ended. In
such support are always to be reckoned facilities for docking, as the
most important of all supports.
[These points are discussed in detail. It is noted that a port with
two outlets, like New York and Vladivostok, has a decided
advantage.—EDITOR.]
III. _Resources_
The wants of a navy are so many and so varied that it would be time lost
to name them separately. The resources which meet them may be usefully
divided under two heads, natural and artificial. The latter, again, may
be conveniently and accurately subdivided into resources developed by
man in his peaceful occupation and use of a country, and those which are
immediately and solely created for the maintenance of war.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account